Adaptive Process Reconfiguration Using Dependency Factors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern computational systems face challenges in dynamically optimizing operational processes due to complex interdependencies among various factors, leading to inefficiencies and underperformance, as traditional methods struggle to adapt to changing conditions and accurately identify critical factors for improvement.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method utilizing a processor and memory to detect dependency factors, determine primary and secondary factors, and generate a modification set of operational factors through machine learning and statistical analysis, allowing for real-time adjustment and streamlining of system performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional methods are used to optimize operational processes, then system stability is maintained, but system performance and adaptability deteriorate due to inability to identify critical factors and adapt to changing conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem adaptabilityVSAvoidsystem performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where operational data is continuously collected, analyzed, and used to adjust process parameters. The processor detects dependency factors and modifies operational factors based on this feedback, enabling the system to adapt to changing conditions while maintaining optimal performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static traditional optimization methods to dynamic adaptive optimization. The processor continuously detects dependency factors among operational factors and adjusts process parameters in real-time based on detected relationships, allowing the system to adapt dynamically to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive analysis of all operational factors is performed, then identification accuracy of critical factors improves, but computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefactor identification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and focuses only on the most critical dependency factors rather than analyzing all operational factors equally. The processor identifies and isolates key factors that have the greatest impact on system performance, reducing computational complexity while maintaining identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the operational factors into different levels of importance and analyzes them hierarchically. By dividing the complex analysis task into manageable segments based on factor significance, the system achieves accurate identification without overwhelming computational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If real-time optimization is implemented, then system efficiency improves, but processing load and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial optimization by focusing computational resources on the most critical dependency factors rather than optimizing all parameters equally. This selective approach maintains system efficiency while reducing overall computational energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes processing parameters based on operational conditions, adjusting the level of optimization detail according to system state. This allows real-time optimization to be performed with variable computational intensity, balancing efficiency gains against energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250298631A1Apparatus and method for dynamic reconfiguration of process parameter
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 THE STRATEGIC COACH
  • US20250298631A1 patent drawing
  • US20250298631A1 patent drawing
  • US20250298631A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The apparatus employs adaptive machine learning for dynamic reconfiguration of process parameter. It consists of a processor and memory. Initially, it detects a dependency factor as a function of a plurality of operational factors of a process. Then it determines a primary factor and at least a secondary factor as a function of the dependency factor. Using at least a processor, modify a processor, the primary factor as a function of a specified modification protocol. Further, it eliminates the at least a secondary factor. Last, using the at least a processor, it generates using the at least a processor, a modification set of the operational factors.