Adaptive Protocol Integration Layer for Multi-System Operations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems face inefficiencies and inflexibility in addressing diverse needs across multi-system operations, requiring substantial resource consumption and time, which compromises outcomes.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for multi-system integration and cooperative operations using adaptive protocols, involving user interface exposure, partial system integration, event detection, protocol implementation, and resource access control, facilitated by integration infrastructure and non-transitory computer-readable media.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional systems are used for multi-system operations, then system stability is maintained, but efficiency and speed are compromised due to inflexibility and substantial resource consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system integrates multiple independent systems (e.g., ERP, CRM, supply chain systems) that can operate autonomously but coordinate through standardized protocols. Each system segment maintains its own operational efficiency while contributing to overall multi-system productivity, reducing the resource burden on any single system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A universal integration layer is implemented that provides common protocols, data models, and communication standards across diverse systems. This multi-functional framework enables different systems to interact efficiently without requiring custom integration for each pair, reducing overall resource consumption while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If conventional systems address diverse needs, then system reliability is maintained, but time and effort are substantially increased due to inflexibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational speedVSAvoidtime to address needs
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The integration framework employs dynamic configuration capabilities that allow systems to adapt their interaction patterns, data models, and protocols based on real-time operational needs. This dynamic adaptation enables rapid response to diverse requirements without the time penalty of conventional reconfiguration, maintaining reliability while accelerating operational speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes parameter-driven integration where behavioral characteristics, data formats, and communication protocols can be modified through parameter adjustments rather than structural changes. This enables quick adaptation to diverse operational needs, reducing the time required to address new requirements while maintaining system reliability through controlled parameter management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If full system integration is implemented, then functionality and data exposure are maximized, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration flexibilityVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The integration framework implements partial integration capabilities that allow systems to connect at appropriate levels of detail without requiring complete end-to-end integration of all functionalities. This selective integration approach maintains adaptability and versatility while managing complexity by integrating only what is necessary for specific operational contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary integration layer is introduced that mediates between diverse systems, handling protocol translation, data transformation, and coordination logic. This intermediary absorbs much of the integration complexity, allowing individual systems to maintain simplicity while achieving high adaptability and versatility through the mediating framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12450105B1Multi-system integration and cooperative multi-system operations in conformance with adaptive protocols
Publication Date: 2025.10.21 THE HUNTINGTON NAT BANK
  • US12450105B1 patent drawing
  • US12450105B1 patent drawing
  • US12450105B1 patent drawing

AI summary

System, methods, and machine-readable media may facilitate multi-system integration and cooperative multi-system operations in conformance with adaptive protocols. A partial system integration of a remote system with an integration infrastructure may be defined. Integration specifications may be generated and transmitted to the remote system to facilitate the partial system integration. A defined event may be detected and mapped to the remote system. An implementation of a protocol may define an operation flow in response to the detection. References to the integration specifications previously transmitted to the remote system may be transmitted. Responses may be received from the remote system, and it may be determined whether the responses conform to parameter constraints of the protocol. Upon determination that the responses to the transmitting of the references satisfy that parameter constraints, access to a resource facilitated by the integration infrastructure may be controlled in accordance with the protocol.