Adaptive QPSK Power Control for Legacy GSM Compatibility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cellular radio systems face challenges with backward compatibility and power control when implementing Orthogonal Sub Channels (OSC), leading to poor performance in legacy receivers and increased handovers, which degrade Key Performance Indicators such as dropped calls, and none of the proposed solutions for Multi-User Reusing One Slot (MUROS) have fulfilled backward compatibility requirements.

Innovation Solution

The method involves using adaptive α-QPSK modulation, where the data is transmitted with a variation of quadrature phase shift keying that allows rectangular symbol constellations, and the transmission power is adjusted based on the relative gain of the two branches, enabling individual power control loops for each sub-channel and reducing total system interference by dynamically allocating energy between the I and Q branches.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If Orthogonal Sub Channels (OSC) are implemented to allow two users to share the same frequency and time slot, then the subscriber base capacity increases, but legacy Gaussian minimum shift keying (GMSK) mobile stations exhibit very poor performance due to QPSK modulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubscriber base capacityVSAvoidlegacy mobile station performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the modulation scheme adaptive rather than fixed. The system dynamically switches between QPSK modulation (for OSC compatibility) and GMSK modulation (for legacy compatibility) based on the receiver type. This allows the system to maintain OSC functionality for modern devices while ensuring backward compatibility with legacy GMSK mobile stations, resolving the contradiction between increased capacity and legacy performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the modulation parameter from fixed QPSK to variable modulation types. By introducing the ability to switch between QPSK and GMSK modulation schemes, the system can adapt to different receiver capabilities. This parameter change enables legacy GMSK mobile stations to receive signals in their native modulation format, eliminating performance degradation while maintaining OSC benefits for QPSK-capable devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If OSC is implemented with fixed power control, then the system structure simplifies, but the Key Performance Indicators such as dropped calls degrade due to additional handovers and cell subdivision requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower control structureVSAvoiddropped calls
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by separating the power control into two independent loops: one for the I-branch and another for the Q-branch. This segmentation allows each sub-channel to have its own optimized power control parameters and thresholds, enabling fine-grained power management that reduces interference and improves call reliability without requiring cell subdivision or additional handovers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic power control where the transmit power is independently adjusted for each branch based on real-time channel conditions and interference levels. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize performance for each user independently, reducing the need for handovers and improving dropped call metrics while maintaining a relatively simple overall power control architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If equal power is allocated to both I and Q branches, then the power control implementation simplifies, but the total system interference increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower control implementationVSAvoidsystem interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allocating different power levels to different branches based on their specific channel conditions and interference characteristics. Instead of uniform power allocation, each branch (I and Q) receives power optimized for its particular usage pattern and interference environment. This localized power optimization reduces overall system interference while the differential power control mechanisms keep implementation complexity manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8760993B2Method of power control
Publication Date: 2014.06.24 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US8760993B2 patent drawing
  • US8760993B2 patent drawing
  • US8760993B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method and a transmitter data is transmitted to two mobile stations sharing the same frequency band and the same timeslot. The data is modulated using a quaternary symbol constellation. Further, the data is transmitted to two mobile stations multiplexed on a shared channel comprising two branches and the transmission power for the transmitted data is set in response to the relative gain of the two branches. Hereby, the total system interference is reduced. The method and transmitter further allows for a cellular radio system individual power control loops for the two sub-channels when the system uses MUROS.