Adaptive Query Execution with Speculative Task Slots

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current parallel database systems are poorly suited for large-scale 'Big Data' processing due to lack of fault tolerance and adaptability, leading to increased query latency and performance inconsistencies across hundreds or thousands of nodes, especially in cloud environments.

Innovation Solution

A parallel processing system that dynamically adjusts to unexpected events by assigning tasks to redundant task slots on worker nodes, maintaining lists of task slots and tasks, and reassigning tasks upon node failures, allowing for immediate execution and minimizing latency through on-the-fly adaptivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If query planning is completed entirely in advance of query execution, then system complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but the system loses adaptability to unexpected events such as server failures or performance degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequery planning simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to server failures
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary query planning in advance to establish the execution plan, but also pre-positions monitoring mechanisms and fault detection capabilities before actual execution begins. This allows the system to have a ready-made plan while being prepared to adapt if conditions change during execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops during query execution that monitor server performance and status. When deviations from expected behavior are detected (such as server slowdowns or failures), the feedback mechanism triggers dynamic plan adjustment, allowing the system to adapt to unexpected events while maintaining overall operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If the system assumes failures are rare events and simply restarts queries upon server failure, then system complexity is minimized, but fault tolerance deteriorates at large scale where failures become statistically more common

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault handling complexityVSAvoidfault tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements speculative execution by launching duplicate tasks on different servers before failures occur. This creates a cushion of redundant execution instances that can take over if the primary task fails, providing fault tolerance without requiring complex post-failure recovery mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its fault handling approach based on runtime conditions. Rather than using a static restart mechanism, the system can dynamically reassign tasks to different servers, adjust execution plans, and activate speculative tasks as needed, providing adaptive fault tolerance that scales with system size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If the system assigns tasks based on expected performance of nodes, then productivity is optimized under normal conditions, but query latency increases when extreme outliers or slow nodes are present

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequery processing throughputVSAvoidquery latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically monitors actual task execution performance and adjusts task assignments in real-time. When a node is identified as a slow outlier, the system can dynamically reassign subsequent tasks to different nodes, preventing the query latency that would result from sticking with underperforming nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses speculative execution to launch duplicate tasks on alternative nodes. This excessive action of creating redundant task instances ensures that if the primary task encounters a slow node, a backup task is already in progress or can quickly take over, reducing the overall query latency impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Device complexity

If homogeneous performance across servers is assumed, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to performance fluctuations in cloud environments deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance management complexityVSAvoidadaptability to performance fluctuations
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous performance monitoring and feedback mechanisms that detect actual server performance characteristics during query execution. This feedback allows the system to adapt to performance fluctuations in cloud environments without requiring complex pre-configuration, as the system learns and adjusts based on observed performance patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes execution parameters such as task assignment priorities, resource allocation, and query plan selection based on observed server performance. Rather than assuming homogeneous performance, the system adjusts parameters in real-time to account for performance variations, maintaining simplicity while achieving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9934276B2Systems and methods for fault tolerant, adaptive execution of arbitrary queries at low latency
Publication Date: 2018.04.03 TERADATA US INC
  • US9934276B2 patent drawing
  • US9934276B2 patent drawing
  • US9934276B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for performing distributed execution of database queries includes a query server that receives a query to be executed on a database, forms a query plan based on the query, assigns tasks to task slots on a plurality of worker nodes in a cluster, and, upon receipt of a notification that a task has completed on a worker node, immediately assigns an unassigned task to a free task slot on that worker node, such that the task may begin executing on that worker node substantially immediately thereafter. The task slots on worker nodes include pools of resources that run tasks without start-up overhead.