Adaptive RACH Procedure Selection for Low-Latency 5G Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The four-step random access channel (RACH) procedure in LTE is not sufficient to meet the low latency requirements of 5G/NR wireless systems, necessitating a faster and more efficient RACH procedure.

Innovation Solution

A two-step RACH procedure is introduced, where the UE combines messages 1 and 3 of the four-step RACH into a single message and the base station combines messages 2 and 4, with the UE selecting the procedure based on RSRP thresholds and transmit power considerations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a four-step RACH procedure is used, then compatibility with LTE systems is maintained, but latency requirements of 5G/NR are not met

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecompatibilityVSAvoidRACH setup time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines messages 1 and 3 of the four-step RACH procedure into a single message 1, and combines messages 2 and 4 into a single message 2. This merging of multiple message exchanges into fewer combined messages directly reduces the RACH setup time while maintaining the essential functionality of the original four-step procedure, thereby resolving the contradiction between LTE compatibility and 5G latency requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Loss of time

If a two-step RACH procedure is implemented, then RACH setup time is reduced, but system complexity increases due to UE-based selection

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRACH setup timeVSAvoidprocedure selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces RSRP thresholds as a parameter to guide UE's selection between two-step and four-step RACH procedures. By changing the decision criterion from a complex multi-factor evaluation to a simple threshold comparison based on RSRP measurements, the patent reduces device complexity while enabling adaptive procedure selection that optimizes RACH setup time based on channel conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If message consolidation is performed, then RACH procedure efficiency is improved, but message reliability requirements become more stringent

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRACH procedure efficiencyVSAvoidmessage transmission reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively consolidating messages based on RSRP thresholds and channel conditions. When conditions are favorable (high RSRP), the two-step consolidated procedure is used to maximize efficiency. When conditions are poor, the system can fall back to the more reliable four-step procedure, thereby balancing efficiency improvements with reliability requirements through conditional partial consolidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP3530059B1Enhanced random access channel (RACH) procedure
Publication Date: 2026.03.11 QUALCOMM INC
  • EP3530059B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3530059B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2D
  • EP3530059B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present disclosure describes a method, an apparatus, and a computer-readable medium for a random access channel (RACH) procedure at a user equipment. For example, the method may select a two-step RACH procedure or a four-step RACH procedure at the UE based at least on RACH configuration information received from a base station or the RACH configuration information at the UE. The example method may further include transmitting, from the UE, one or more messages associated with the two-step RACH procedure or the four-step RACH procedure based on the selection.