Adaptive RAID Data Placement for SSD Garbage Collection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing RAID systems are not suitable for storage devices like SSDs that implement logical data management and garbage collection processes, leading to performance overhead and reduced longevity due to striping and parity generation methods.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for adaptive RAID management within a storage device using firmware, enabling flexible data placement and error recovery through reclaim groups and units, with parity information and redundant data inaccessible to the host computer, and supporting RAID levels like RAID-6 and RAID-1.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional RAID striping and parity generation methods are used in storage devices like SSDs, then data redundancy and fault tolerance are improved, but performance overhead increases and device longevity decreases due to garbage collection conflicts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata redundancyVSAvoidperformance overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The storage device is segmented into multiple reclaim groups, each containing multiple reclaim units. This segmentation allows the system to manage data and parity information in smaller, independent units, enabling selective garbage collection operations that do not require processing entire stripes, thus reducing performance overhead while maintaining data redundancy through distributed parity across segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically manages reclaim groups and reclaim units based on workload conditions and garbage collection needs. Reclaim units can be dynamically selected for processing based on their state (e.g., whether they contain valid data or are already erased), allowing the system to adapt its operations to minimize performance overhead while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If traditional RAID striping is used in storage devices, then data redundancy is improved, but device longevity decreases due to increased write amplification from garbage collection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata redundancyVSAvoiddevice lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the storage device into reclaim groups and reclaim units, the system can perform garbage collection on individual units rather than entire stripes. This reduces the total number of write operations required during garbage collection, lowering write amplification and extending device lifespan while maintaining data redundancy through distributed parity across the segmented structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-managing garbage collection where reclaim units that are already erased or contain only invalid data are automatically identified and skipped during garbage collection operations. This self-service approach reduces unnecessary write operations, decreasing write amplification and extending device lifespan while preserving data redundancy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If parity information is generated and stored for all data blocks, then data recovery capability is improved, but storage efficiency decreases due to increased overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata recovery capabilityVSAvoidstorage efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates and stores parity information at the reclaim unit level rather than for entire stripes, and only for units containing valid data. This segmented approach reduces the total quantity of parity information stored, improving storage efficiency while maintaining data recovery capability through distributed parity across multiple reclaim groups and units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial parity generation by creating parity information only for reclaim units that contain valid data, rather than for all data blocks. This partial action reduces the overall amount of parity information stored, improving storage efficiency while maintaining sufficient data recovery capability through the distributed parity structure across reclaim groups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260044289A1System and method for data management with adaptive raid in storage devices
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20260044289A1 patent drawing
  • US20260044289A1 patent drawing
  • US20260044289A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for data management provided. The system may include a processing circuitry, a memory coupled to the processing circuitry, a storage device coupled to the processing circuitry, a communication interface for data transfer with a host computer, a firmware stored in the memory which when executed by the processing circuitry, causes the processing circuitry to receive data from the host computer via the communication interface, distribute the data across the storage device in accordance with a selected RAID level, wherein RAID functionality is embedded within a single HDD and configured by a user, generate redundant data or parity information for the data based on the selected RAID level, store the data and corresponding parity information or the redundant data within the storage device, and manage one or more reclaim groups and one or more reclaim units within the storage device to place the data and manage garbage collection.