Adaptive Ratcheting Retainer for Variable-Diameter Wire Bundles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fastening techniques for automotive components are limited in adjustability, leading to increased complexity and waste, as they often require multiple clip designs and additional steps for assembly, and existing solutions either sag or require heavy, expensive metal components.

Innovation Solution

A ratcheting retainer system that includes a ratchet strap assembly, a fastener, and a retainer clip, allowing for adjustable retention of objects of varying diameters without additional components, fabricated from lightweight materials like plastics using additive manufacturing techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple clip designs are fabricated to address different diameters, then objects of various diameters can be retained, but plant complexity and part numbers increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretention of objects of varying diametersVSAvoidplant complexity and part numbers
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer is designed as a universal component that can retain objects of various diameters through a single adjustable mechanism. The expandable body allows the retainer to adapt to different sizes without requiring multiple specialized clips, thereby reducing plant complexity and part numbers while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The retainer incorporates an expandable body that can dynamically adjust its internal diameter to accommodate different object sizes. This dynamic adjustment capability eliminates the need for multiple static clip designs, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If straps and zip ties are used to accommodate objects of varying diameters, then adjustability is achieved, but tooling is required and trimming steps are added

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustability to varying diametersVSAvoidassembly steps and tooling requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer is designed to be self-installing without requiring external tools or trimming operations. The expandable body mechanism allows the retainer to automatically adjust and secure objects of varying diameters through simple insertion, eliminating the need for tooling and trimming steps while maintaining adjustability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts the problematic elements (tooling requirements and trimming steps) from the assembly process by designing a retainer that achieves adjustability through its expandable structure rather than through material removal or tool-assisted mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Strength

If metal products are used for fastening, then strength and reliability are improved, but weight and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefastening reliabilityVSAvoidretainer weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer is constructed from composite or engineered materials that provide high strength-to-weight ratio. This allows the retainer to achieve metal-level strength and reliability while maintaining the lightweight advantage of non-metallic materials, resolving the contradiction between strength and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the material parameters by using advanced polymers or composite materials with enhanced mechanical properties. This enables the retainer to achieve sufficient strength for reliable fastening while keeping weight low, eliminating the need to choose between metal strength and lightweight construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Weight of moving object

If existing plastic solutions are used, then weight is reduced, but drooping or sagging occurs when attaching larger objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretainer weightVSAvoidretention capability for larger objects
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer incorporates a dynamic expandable body that can adjust its structural configuration based on the load and object size. This allows the lightweight plastic retainer to maintain its weight advantage while achieving sufficient retention capability for larger objects through structural adaptation rather than material weight increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The use of composite or engineered plastic materials provides enhanced strength and stiffness to lightweight retainer construction, preventing drooping or sagging when attaching larger objects while maintaining the weight reduction benefits of plastic materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS12140254B2Adaptive retainer
Publication Date: 2024.11.12 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • US12140254B2 patent drawing
  • US12140254B2 patent drawing
  • US12140254B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a ratcheting retainer for securing one or more objects, such as wire bundles, to a component. The ratcheting retainer includes a ratchet strap assembly, a fastener, and retainer clip. The ratchet strap assembly, which can adjust in diameter, circumscribes and secures a first object. The fastener is coupled to the ratchet strap assembly and secures the ratcheting retainer to the component. The retainer clip is coupled to the ratchet strap assembly and secures a second object to the ratchet strap assembly.