Adaptive Rateless Coding for Sidelink Redundancy Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face inefficiencies in sidelink communications due to fixed network coding redundancy configurations, leading to resource misallocation, increased latency, and decreased reliability, as they do not adapt to varying channel conditions between user equipment (UEs).

Innovation Solution

Implementing adaptive rateless coding by allowing UEs to report redundancy feedback information to adjust the amount of redundancy for future transmissions based on channel conditions, using rateless encoding and decoding algorithms, and dynamically updating network coding parameters to optimize sidelink communications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If fixed network coding redundancy configuration is used, then device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but resource utilization deteriorates and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidresource utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of network coding redundancy parameters based on real-time channel conditions. The transmitting UE receives feedback from the receiving UE about decoding success and adapts the redundancy level (K value) accordingly, transitioning from a static fixed configuration to a dynamic adaptive system that optimizes resource utilization while maintaining ease of operation through automated feedback-driven adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If fixed network coding redundancy configuration is used, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to inability to adapt to varying channel conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidcommunication reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a feedback mechanism where the receiving UE sends acknowledgments or negative acknowledgments to the transmitting UE based on successful or unsuccessful packet decoding. This feedback enables the transmitting UE to adapt the network coding redundancy parameters dynamically, improving communication reliability by responding to actual channel conditions while keeping device complexity manageable through standardized feedback protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If fixed network coding redundancy configuration is used, then ease of operation is improved, but latency increases due to resource misallocation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables dynamic adaptation of redundancy parameters based on real-time channel conditions and decoding feedback. When channel conditions are good, the system reduces redundancy to minimize transmission overhead and latency. When conditions deteriorate, it increases redundancy to ensure successful delivery, thereby optimizing latency performance while maintaining ease of operation through automated adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If adaptive rateless coding is implemented, then resource utilization is improved and productivity increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilizationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs feedback-driven adaptation where the receiving UE reports decoding status to the transmitting UE. This feedback mechanism enables intelligent adjustment of redundancy parameters to optimize resource utilization without requiring complex centralized control. The system achieves improved productivity by adapting to actual channel conditions while managing device complexity through distributed feedback-based decision making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

5Reliability

If adaptive rateless coding is implemented, then communication reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback-based reliability optimization where the receiving UE sends decoding results back to the transmitting UE. This enables dynamic adjustment of network coding parameters to ensure successful packet delivery under varying channel conditions. The system improves communication reliability through this closed-loop feedback mechanism while keeping device complexity manageable by using standardized feedback messages and algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

6Loss of time

If adaptive rateless coding is implemented, then latency is reduced through optimized resource allocation, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic parameter adjustment based on real-time feedback about channel conditions and decoding success. The system transitions from static fixed redundancy configuration to dynamic adaptive coding, reducing latency by optimizing the amount of redundancy transmitted based on actual needs. This dynamic approach reduces unnecessary retransmissions and optimizes resource allocation while managing device complexity through automated feedback-driven control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12155486B2Adaptive rateless coding for sidelink communications
Publication Date: 2024.11.26 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12155486B2 patent drawing
  • US12155486B2 patent drawing
  • US12155486B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described. A first user equipment (UE) may receive and decode a network-coded message over a sidelink channel from a second UE, the network-coded message encoded using a rateless encoding algorithm. The first UE may report redundancy feedback information to the second UE for the network-coded message. Based on the feedback information, the second UE may adjust an amount of redundancy used to encode future messages to the first UE that are encoded using the rateless encoding algorithm.