Adaptive Regularization Strength Control for Deep Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional regularization techniques in deep learning are uniform across all training data, leading to overfitting for simple data and reduced efficiency for difficult data, as they do not adaptively control the strength of regularization based on the training data.

Innovation Solution

A learning device and method that calculates weights using a rapidly increasing weight function and applies a monotonically increasing rescale function to the regularization term, optimizing the inference model with a total loss that adjusts the regularization strength based on the training data, thereby adapting the regularization strength for each mini-batch.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If uniform regularization is applied to all training data, then overfitting is suppressed for simple data, but learning efficiency is reduced for difficult data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeneralization performanceVSAvoidlearning efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different regularization strengths to different training samples based on their individual characteristics. Specifically, samples with high model confidence receive stronger regularization, while samples with low confidence receive weaker regularization. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by tailoring the regularization effect to each sample's needs rather than applying a uniform approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The regularization strength is dynamically adjusted during training based on the model's predicted confidence for each sample. The confidence score, derived from the inference model's output, serves as a dynamic parameter that modulates the regularization term. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to adaptively balance between preventing overfitting and maintaining learning efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If strong regularization is applied to difficult training data, then overfitting is prevented, but learning efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeneralization performanceVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent selectively applies strong regularization only to samples where the model exhibits high confidence, which are more prone to overfitting. For difficult samples with low confidence, the regularization strength is reduced, allowing the model to learn from these challenging cases without excessive penalty. This localized application optimizes the balance between preventing overfitting and preserving training efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The regularization parameter is changed based on the confidence score of each sample. By modulating the regularization strength as a variable parameter rather than a fixed value, the system can adaptively respond to different sample characteristics, reducing unnecessary regularization for difficult samples and thereby reducing training time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If weak regularization is applied to simple training data, then learning efficiency is improved, but overfitting occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning efficiencyVSAvoidoverfitting
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent identifies simple samples through high confidence scores and applies stronger regularization specifically to these cases. This local quality approach ensures that overfitting-prone samples receive appropriate regularization strength, while not unnecessarily penalizing difficult samples that benefit from weaker regularization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the model's own confidence predictions as feedback to determine the appropriate regularization strength for each sample. This feedback mechanism allows the system to automatically identify which samples are prone to overfitting and apply corresponding regularization, creating a self-regulating process that prevents overfitting while maintaining efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240362543A1Learning device, learning method, and recording medium
Publication Date: 2024.10.31 NEC CORP
  • US20240362543A1 patent drawing
  • US20240362543A1 patent drawing
  • US20240362543A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In a learning device, an inference means performs an inference with respect to training data using an inference model, and outputs a class score. A weight calculation means calculates each weight using a weight function which rapidly increases faster than a linear function for the class score that is over-estimated or under-estimated, based on output the class score. A weight sum calculation means calculates a total of weights over a mini-batch included in a predetermined number of training data. A regularization term calculation means calculates a regularization term by applying a rescale function which is a monotonically increasing function gradually increasing more than a linear function, to the regularization term. An optimization means optimizes the inference model using a total loss including the regularization term.