Adaptive Regularization for Language Model Interpretation Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current language processing systems, particularly in speech and text applications, face challenges in accurately interpreting user inputs due to limitations in regularization techniques, which fail to reflect user expectations and intents, leading to inaccurate results, especially in sparse data scenarios.

Innovation Solution

The method involves forming or accessing a classification and regression model, receiving training data, and employing prior knowledge to optimize the model by adjusting feature weights and incorporating it into the cost function, giving higher priority to more general features within the training data, thereby improving the model's generalization and accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If standard regularization techniques are used in language processing models, then the model can be trained efficiently, but the interpretation accuracy deteriorates because the regularization fails to reflect user expectations and intents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterpretation accuracyVSAvoidaccuracy in reflecting user expectations
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different regularization strengths to different features based on their importance and characteristics. By making the regularization parameter adaptive and feature-specific rather than uniform, the system can preserve important features that reflect user expectations while still regularizing less important features to prevent overfitting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the regularization parameter based on the specific characteristics of each feature and the training data. This adaptive approach allows the regularization strength to change locally for different features rather than applying a fixed global parameter, thereby improving both accuracy and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the model prioritizes fitting the training data closely, then training accuracy improves, but generalization to real-world data deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining accuracyVSAvoidgeneralization to real-world data
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic regularization parameters that adapt during training based on the specific features and data characteristics. This dynamic adjustment allows the model to balance fitting the training data while maintaining the ability to generalize, rather than using a static regularization strength throughout training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates prior knowledge about feature importance and data characteristics before training begins. This preliminary information is used to set initial regularization parameters that prevent overfitting from the start, allowing the model to learn general patterns rather than memorizing training data specifics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If more training data is collected to improve model accuracy, then interpretation precision improves, but the complexity and cost of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterpretation precisionVSAvoiddata collection and processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the regularization parameter based on the available training data characteristics rather than requiring more data. By adapting the regularization strength to the specific dataset being used, the system can achieve good performance with limited data, avoiding the need for extensive data collection infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The adaptive regularization parameter acts as an intermediary that bridges the gap between limited training data and high interpretation accuracy. Instead of directly increasing data quantity, the system uses this intermediary parameter to compensate for data limitations and achieve comparable or better performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11593572B2System and method for language processing using adaptive regularization
Publication Date: 2023.02.28 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US11593572B2 patent drawing
  • US11593572B2 patent drawing
  • US11593572B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method incorporate prior knowledge into the optimization and regularization of a classification and regression model. The optimization may be a regularization process and the prior knowledge may be incorporated through adjustment of a cost function. A method of at least one processor developing a classification and regression model may be provided. The method may be implemented by at least one processor that implements classification and regression model functionality, including receiving training data and adjusting the model according to the training data; testing the classification and regression model; and employing prior knowledge during an optimization of the classification and regression model. The regularizing can include adjusting feature weights according to prior knowledge. In various embodiments, such systems and methods can be used in the processing of language inputs, e.g., speech and/or text inputs, to achieve greater interpretation accuracy.