Adaptive Remeshing for Cohesive Zone Debonding Simulations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current debonding simulations using cohesive zone models face inefficiencies due to the need for highly refined initial meshes, which are computationally expensive and time-consuming, especially when dealing with high-adhesion debonding between soft materials, and often fail to selectively remesh areas where debonding mechanics are active.

Innovation Solution

The method involves adaptive remeshing driven by criteria such as released energy, damage parameters, and contact status, allowing for selective refinement and coarsening of mesh elements based on specific debonding conditions, thereby improving computational efficiency and accuracy without requiring specialized finite elements or field formulations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If highly refined initial meshes are used to accurately simulate debonding mechanics, then manufacturing precision and reliability are improved, but computational cost and time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemesh refinement accuracyVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptivity that automatically adjusts mesh resolution during the simulation based on the computational solution. The system refines mesh in regions where debonding is active and coarsens it where debonding has completed, transforming the static mesh into a dynamic structure that adapts to the evolving physical state. This resolves the contradiction by providing high accuracy only where and when needed, rather than uniformly across the entire model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies non-uniform mesh distribution where different regions of the model have different levels of discretization. Specifically, areas with active debonding mechanics maintain fine mesh resolution to capture local stress and deformation details, while fully debonded regions use coarser mesh to reduce computational burden. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between overall accuracy and computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If mesh refinement is applied uniformly across the entire model, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebonding simulation accuracyVSAvoidsimulation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a feedback mechanism where the computational solution (damage parameters, contact status, released energy) is continuously monitored and used to control mesh adaptation. The system detects regions where debonding is active through damage parameter thresholds and contact element status, then automatically refines mesh in those specific locations. This feedback-driven approach ensures high measurement precision is applied only where physically necessary, reducing overall simulation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of applying full mesh refinement uniformly across the entire model, the patent applies partial refinement only to specific regions where debonding mechanics are active. The system identifies these regions through damage parameter criteria and contact status evaluation, then applies refinement selectively. This partial action approach maintains necessary accuracy while avoiding the time loss associated with uniform refinement of the entire model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If adaptive remeshing is implemented to dynamically adjust mesh resolution, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidmesh adaptation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service adaptive remeshing system where the simulation automatically controls its own mesh resolution based on internal physical state indicators. The system uses damage parameters, contact status, and released energy calculations inherent to the debonding analysis to autonomously determine where mesh refinement is needed, without requiring external intervention or complex user-defined criteria. This self-service approach improves productivity while managing complexity by using the existing physical model variables to drive adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal adaptive remeshing framework that can handle multiple debonding scenarios and material behaviors through a single set of criteria-based rules. The same damage parameter thresholds and contact status evaluations apply regardless of the specific debonding case, making the system broadly applicable. This universality improves productivity across different applications while avoiding the complexity of implementing separate specialized remeshing algorithms for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240378814A1Cohesive zone-based criteria for adaptivity driven debonding analysis
Publication Date: 2024.11.14 ANSYS INC
  • US20240378814A1 patent drawing
  • US20240378814A1 patent drawing
  • US20240378814A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to criteria for adaptive remeshing in debonding simulations. For example, one or more embodiments described herein include a computer-implemented method comprising determining, by a processor, a released energy, a damage parameter value, or a contact status of a contact element included within a first mesh that represents a region of physical objects simulated by a cohesive zone model. The computer-implemented method can also comprise remeshing, by the processor, a finite element associated with the contact element to generate a second mesh to represent the region based on the released energy, the damage parameter value, or the contact status to obtain physical characteristics associated with a debonding of the physical objects.