Adaptive Remote Control System Using State-Aware Macro Execution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing remote controls for consumer electronics are complex and non-intuitive, requiring multiple commands to configure devices for specific activities, and macro systems are state-less, leading to operational failures if device states deviate from assumptions, making it difficult for users to troubleshoot and customize their remote control configurations.

Innovation Solution

A remote control system that logs user interactions, analyzes patterns, and adjusts configurations based on user behavior, allowing for adaptive configuration through an interactive process that suggests changes and updates command sets to optimize device control according to user preferences and usage patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If macro systems are used to control multiple devices, then the number of commands required is reduced, but the system becomes state-less and fails when device states deviate from assumptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of commands requiredVSAvoidmacro execution reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system polls devices to determine their current state before executing macro commands, creating a feedback loop that ensures commands are sent based on actual device conditions rather than assumptions. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining ease of operation through automated macros while improving reliability through state verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The macro system transitions from being static and state-less to dynamic and state-aware by continuously polling device states and adapting command execution accordingly. This allows the system to maintain simplicity while responding to changing device conditions, resolving the reliability issue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If a single remote control is used to control multiple devices, then device ubiquity is improved, but the configuration becomes non-intuitive and difficult to operate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice control capabilityVSAvoidremote control intuitiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The remote control system automatically determines device states and selects appropriate commands without requiring user knowledge of device configurations or states. The system serves itself by polling devices and making intelligent decisions, making the remote intuitive to operate while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes its operational parameters dynamically based on device states, selecting different commands and sequences depending on what the devices are currently doing. This makes the remote adaptable to different situations while remaining easy to use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If macro commands are programmed to control devices, then operation speed is improved, but the system cannot adapt to changes in device states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem configuration speedVSAvoiddevice state adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary polling actions to determine device states before executing macro commands. This preliminary check ensures that the subsequent command execution is both fast (maintaining productivity) and adapted to actual device conditions (improving adaptability).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

By continuously polling devices for state information and using this feedback to adjust macro execution, the system maintains high productivity through automated control while simultaneously adapting to changing device states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9934679B2System and method for adaptive programming of a remote control
Publication Date: 2018.04.03 LOGITECH EUROPE SA
  • US9934679B2 patent drawing
  • US9934679B2 patent drawing
  • US9934679B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for adaptively configuring a remote control includes analyzing a log of events, maintained by the remote control, which indicate how the remote control and the devices it controls are used by a user. Once the analysis is performed, the system and method can suggest alternative configurations of the remote control to the user. The range and type of alternative configurations is not particularly limited and can include changing which devices are employed for various user activities and/or how those activities are performed, the placement and hierarchy of commands in a menu tree and/or troubleshooting and set up configurations. The analysis can be performed either partially or totally within the remote control, or at, or in conjunction with, a service to which the remote control connects through a network.