Adaptive Replication Scheduling in Storage Clusters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Distributed storage systems face challenges in efficiently managing the replication of objects across multiple storage clusters due to varying resource capacities and network conditions, leading to inefficiencies in replication scheduling and resource utilization.

Innovation Solution

A method that organizes objects into groups based on replication choices, prioritizes them based on priority values, and schedules replication considering maximum sending, receiving, and channel capacities to optimize resource utilization and adapt to changing conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If replication scheduling is performed without considering resource capacities and network conditions, then the replication process is simple, but resource utilization is inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoidscheduling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic replication scheduling that adapts to changing resource capacities and network conditions. The system continuously monitors sending capacities, receiving capacities, and channel capacities, then adjusts replication schedules in real-time to optimize resource utilization while managing complexity through structured data models and algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms by monitoring the actual performance of replication operations and using this information to adjust future scheduling decisions. The scheduler receives feedback about resource usage and network conditions, then optimizes subsequent replication plans to improve overall efficiency while maintaining manageable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If multiple objects are replicated simultaneously without prioritization, then processing is parallelized, but high-priority objects may be delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepriority request fulfillmentVSAvoidoverall replication throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the replication workload into priority-based groups. Objects are classified into different priority levels, and the scheduling system processes high-priority objects separately from lower-priority ones. This segmentation ensures that critical replication requests are fulfilled reliably while still allowing parallel processing within each priority segment to maintain overall throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different quality of service levels to different objects based on their priority. High-priority objects receive preferential treatment in terms of resource allocation and scheduling timing, while lower-priority objects are processed according to available capacity. This local differentiation ensures reliable fulfillment of critical requests without completely halting other replication operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If replication schedules are fixed, then scheduling is simple, but the system cannot adapt to changing network conditions and resource capacities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changing conditionsVSAvoidscheduling mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic replication scheduling that continuously adapts to changing resource capacities and network conditions. The system monitors sending capacities, receiving capacities, and channel capacities in real-time, then adjusts replication schedules dynamically to optimize performance while maintaining manageable complexity through structured algorithms and data models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Quantity of substance

If replication resources are over-allocated, then more objects can be replicated, but resource contention and failures increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of objects replicatedVSAvoidreplication success rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs feedback mechanisms by monitoring the actual performance and success rate of replication operations. When resource contention or failures are detected, the scheduler adjusts future resource allocation to prevent over-allocation. This feedback loop allows the system to maximize the number of objects replicated while maintaining high reliability by adapting to actual system conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9110823B2Adaptive and prioritized replication scheduling in storage clusters
Publication Date: 2015.08.18 GOOGLE LLC
  • US9110823B2 patent drawing
  • US9110823B2 patent drawing
  • US9110823B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one implementation, groups of objects may be maintained, each group including one or more objects that are to be replicated at one or more of the storage clusters. The objects may be assigned to the groups based on replication choices where at least some of the objects are assigned to multiple ones of the groups. A priority value may be determined and associated with each of the groups, the priority value of a particular group being determined based on priority values associated with objects within the particular group. The objects may be selected, for replication, in a replication order based on the priority value of the groups and replication of the selected objects may be initiated.