Adaptive Foundation Model Resource Allocation for Inference and Fine-Tuning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing resource allocation strategies for AI models, particularly for inference and fine-tune operations, are static and fail to adapt to dynamic workloads and resource constraints, leading to underutilization and inefficiency.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for dynamic resource allocation using a second model to generate policies based on confidence scores and request data, balancing resource allocation between interdependent operations like inference and fine-tuning through a reward function.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If static resource allocation is used, then resource allocation is simple to implement, but resource utilization is low and system performance is hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEase of implementationVSAvoidResource utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic resource allocation that adapts to changing workload conditions. The system continuously monitors workload dynamics and resource availability, adjusting resource allocation in real-time between inference and fine-tune operations. This dynamic approach resolves the contradiction by moving from static to adaptive allocation, improving resource utilization while maintaining implementability through automated control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms to monitor workload conditions and resource utilization, using this information to adjust resource allocation decisions. The feedback loop enables the system to respond to changing conditions automatically, improving resource utilization without requiring complex manual intervention, thus resolving the contradiction between ease of implementation and resource utilization efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If more epochs are used during fine-tuning, then model accuracy is improved, but computational cost and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveModel accuracyVSAvoidComputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by allocating resources dynamically based on actual needs rather than consistently maximizing epochs. The dynamic resource allocation determines the appropriate number of epochs to run based on current workload conditions, resource availability, and model performance requirements. This approach achieves sufficient accuracy improvements while avoiding the excessive computational cost of always running maximum epochs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of epoch count dynamically based on workload conditions and resource availability. Rather than fixing the number of epochs, the system adjusts this parameter in real-time, allocating more epochs when resources are abundant and accuracy is prioritized, and fewer epochs when resources are constrained, thus resolving the contradiction between accuracy improvement and computational cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If dynamic resource allocation is implemented, then resource utilization is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveResource utilizationVSAvoidSystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service through automated resource allocation that makes decisions based on monitored workload conditions. The dynamic allocation mechanism autonomously determines resource distribution between inference and fine-tune operations without requiring complex external control systems. This self-managing approach improves resource utilization while limiting system complexity by eliminating the need for sophisticated external orchestration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250315297A1Adaptive Foundation Models Operations in a constrained resource environment
Publication Date: 2025.10.09 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20250315297A1 patent drawing
  • US20250315297A1 patent drawing
  • US20250315297A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for resource allocation is provided. The system determines first request data of a first queue. The first queue comprises first tasks associated with a first operation of a first model. The system determines confidence data of an output of each of the first tasks. The system allocates second tasks to a second queue based on the confidence data. The system determines second request data of the second queue. The second queue comprises the second tasks associated with a second operation of the first model. The system generates a policy for resource allocation using a second model based on the first request data, the confidence data, and the second request data. The second model is configured to generate the policy based on a reward function. The system controls allocation of resources for the first operation and the second operation based on the policy.