Adaptive Information Retrieval with Dynamic Privacy Budgeting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing privacy-preserving information retrieval methods constrain researchers by fixed query limits or static noise distributions, limiting the effectiveness of research and potentially exposing personal data through noise correction.

Innovation Solution

Adaptive privacy-preserving information retrieval techniques that dynamically adjust privacy allocations and noise parameters based on query-specific factors, using a truncated discrete Gaussian distribution to balance information provision with privacy protection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If fixed query limits are imposed to protect privacy, then privacy protection is improved, but research effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidresearch effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic query limits that adjust based on multiple factors including query complexity, data sensitivity, user trust level, and privacy budget consumption. Instead of fixed limits, the system continuously adapts the number and type of queries allowed, enabling researchers to conduct more comprehensive studies while maintaining privacy protection through adaptive constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes privacy-related parameters dynamically, including noise levels added to responses, query rate limits, and access permissions. By adjusting these parameters based on real-time conditions such as privacy budget remaining and query patterns, the system optimizes the balance between providing useful research data and protecting individual privacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If static noise distributions are used to preserve privacy, then privacy protection is improved, but information provision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidinformation provision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic noise calibration that adjusts the amount and distribution of noise added to query responses based on the specific query characteristics, data sensitivity, and privacy budget. High-value queries with broader categories receive less noise, while sensitive or narrow queries receive more noise, optimizing the information-privacy trade-off for each response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Different noise levels and distributions are applied to different parts of the data response based on sensitivity analysis. The system identifies which portions of the response contain more sensitive information and applies localized noise adjustments, preserving useful information in less sensitive areas while maintaining privacy in sensitive areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Loss of information

If researchers are given access to detailed data, then information provision is improved, but privacy exposure deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation provisionVSAvoidprivacy exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces multiple intermediary layers between the raw data and researcher access, including aggregated data views, controlled query interfaces, and automated response generation systems. These intermediaries process and transform data in ways that preserve research utility while preventing direct access to sensitive individual records.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous monitoring and feedback mechanisms that track query patterns, data access usage, and privacy budget consumption. This feedback is used to dynamically adjust access permissions, add noise to responses, or terminate access when privacy thresholds are approached, preventing privacy exposure while maintaining research productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260044626A1Adaptive privacy-preserving information retrieval
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20260044626A1 patent drawing
  • US20260044626A1 patent drawing
  • US20260044626A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including medium-encoded computer program products, for adaptive privacy-preserving information retrieval. An information server can accept from a user a request for privacy sensitive information accessible to the information server. The information server can determine a remaining privacy allocation for the user of the information server and can determine a noise parameter for a response to the request, where application of the noise parameter to the response can decrease a privacy loss associated with the response. The information server can determine a privacy modifier for the response. In response to the information server determining that the remaining privacy allocation satisfies the privacy modifier, the information server can: (i) determining the response to the request; (ii) apply the noise parameter to the response to produce a noised response; (iii) provide the noised response to the user; and (iv) adjust the remaining privacy allocation according to the privacy modifier.