Adaptive RFID Localization System for Dynamic Access Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing RFID-based object localization systems are limited in dynamic sensing reconfiguration and access control, failing to adapt to varying application demands and providing inadequate security features.

Innovation Solution

A networked RFID system with software modules that utilize hierarchical and probabilistic threshold calculations, adjustable configuration settings, and semantic attribute determination to localize RFID tags, enforce access control, and adjust RF settings based on time intervals and security levels, incorporating locking devices and mobile communications for enhanced authorization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If RFID systems use fixed configuration settings, then system simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to varying application demands deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to varying application demandsVSAvoidsensing reconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically reconfigures RFID sensing parameters (RF signal strength, antenna gain, polarization, orientation) based on detected object characteristics and application requirements. The software module automatically adjusts configuration settings in real-time, transforming a static system into an adaptive one that responds to changing conditions without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes multiple RFID system parameters simultaneously (signal strength, antenna characteristics, polarization) to optimize performance for different applications. By systematically varying these parameters and evaluating their effects on object detection and localization, the system achieves high adaptability across diverse scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If basic location determination is implemented, then system simplicity is maintained, but functional capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The RFID system is designed to perform multiple functions using the same hardware infrastructure: object detection, localization, characterization, access control, and security monitoring. The software module orchestrates these different functions by configuring appropriate sensing parameters and processing algorithms, allowing one system to serve multiple purposes without requiring separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments functionality into distinct software modules that can be independently activated based on application needs. Each module handles specific tasks (localization, access control, security), allowing the system to provide enhanced functionality while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If access control features are added, then security is improved, but system complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidaccess control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The access control functionality is merged with the existing RFID sensing and localization system. The same RFID readers and tags used for object detection are also used for access control decisions. The software module integrates security logic with the sensing processing, combining multiple functions into a unified system that reduces overall complexity compared to separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Measurement precision

If hierarchical threshold calculations are implemented, then localization precision is improved, but computational complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocalization precisionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations and establishes threshold values in advance based on system characteristics and environmental factors. These pre-computed thresholds are then used during runtime for rapid localization decisions, reducing real-time computational complexity while maintaining high precision through the hierarchical evaluation structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables precise localization and dynamic access control, improving security and adaptability by accurately determining RFID tag positions and authorizing access based on time-sensitive and security-level-specific settings, thereby enhancing system flexibility and reliability.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of radio frequency identification (RFID) tag readers, a computer in signal communication with the RFID tag readers over a network

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadio frequency identification (RFID): Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS11061133B2Monitoring sensing system
Publication Date: 2021.07.13 LUCOMM TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11061133B2 patent drawing
  • US11061133B2 patent drawing
  • US11061133B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A monitoring system includes a first sensor and a second sensor, at least one of which is a camera. A computer system coupled to the first and second sensors includes a memory and stored object types and associations between objects. The computer system is configured to infer a group association between a first and second object by retrieving an input from at least one of the sensors, inferring an interaction at a monitored location, infer possession of the second object by the first object, and terminate the inferred group association based on a subsequent inference.