Adaptive Risk Processing System for Debt Collection Vendor Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Healthcare providers face challenges in professionally selecting, regulating, and managing quality debt collection vendors due to limited resources and unawareness of risks associated with available vendors, often relying on expensive and outdated risk assessment techniques.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive and tunable processing system that determines compliance and risk scores using variables like litigation category, licensing category, and consumer sentiment, providing a stratified score to assess the risk of using a particular entity for debt collection services.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If healthcare providers hire experts to assess compliance matters, then the accuracy of risk assessment improves, but the cost and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment accuracyVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a computational copy of expert risk assessment capabilities through machine learning models. The system trains algorithms on historical compliance data and expert evaluations, enabling the computational system to replicate expert-level risk assessment accuracy without requiring actual expert involvement for each assessment, thereby reducing resource consumption while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of human expert review with an automated computational system. Machine learning models and adaptive filters process compliance data algorithmically, substituting human cognitive processes with computational algorithms that can scale without additional resource consumption while maintaining or improving assessment accuracy through consistent application of trained criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If healthcare providers conduct thorough compliance screening of collection agencies, then the reliability of vendor selection improves, but the time and resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevendor selection reliabilityVSAvoidscreening time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-training machine learning models on extensive historical compliance data before actual vendor assessments are needed. The system performs preliminary data collection and analysis to build predictive models that can quickly evaluate new vendors, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual screening while maintaining reliable vendor selection through pre-established assessment criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a computational replica of thorough compliance screening processes. Machine learning models are trained to copy the decision-making patterns of expert reviewers, enabling the system to perform comprehensive vendor evaluations automatically without requiring the same time investment as manual expert review, thereby maintaining reliability while reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If healthcare providers use detailed risk assessment techniques, then the compliance score accuracy improves, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance score accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by breaking down the complex risk assessment task into distinct computational components: data collection modules, preprocessing filters, machine learning model layers, and output generation components. Each segment handles a specific aspect of the assessment, allowing the system to achieve high compliance score accuracy through specialized processing while managing overall complexity through modular architecture that can be developed and maintained independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universality through multi-functional machine learning models that can handle various types of compliance data and assessment scenarios with a single unified system. The adaptive filters and trained models serve multiple purposes including data validation, risk prediction, and score generation, reducing system complexity compared to having separate specialized systems for each function while maintaining measurement precision through integrated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10614495B2Adaptive and tunable risk processing system and method
Publication Date: 2020.04.07 EXPERIAN HEALTH INC
  • US10614495B2 patent drawing
  • US10614495B2 patent drawing
  • US10614495B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects described herein pertain to the use of an adaptive and tunable processing system and method to provide a risk assessment and compliance analysis, but are not so limited. An adaptive and tunable processing system of an embodiment adaptively determines an amount of compliance and/or risk based on one or more quantification variables, including one or more of a litigation category variable, a licensing category variable, and/or a consumer sentiment category variable, to generate a stratified score that quantifies an amount of compliance and/or risk associated with a particular entity. The system of an embodiment uses one or more adaptive filters tuned to output values corresponding to an amount of compliance and/or risk associated with use of a particular entity to perform a service or services.