Adaptive Robot Gripping Sequences for Mixed Goods Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing storage and order-picking systems are inflexible and unsuitable for handling a large variety of different goods, often requiring manual intervention by warehouse staff, which can be detrimental to their health, especially when handling heavy or diverse items.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that differentiate goods based on physical parameters such as dimensional stability, compressive stability, flexural rigidity, strength, and weight to control the robot's gripping unit movements, allowing it to adapt to different types of goods, enabling flexible handling and reducing manual labor.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a robot system uses a fixed gripping strategy for all goods, then the system is simple to operate, but it cannot handle a large variety of different goods types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle different goods typesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes operational parameters (gripping force, motion speed, acceleration) based on detected goods properties. The robot controller adjusts these parameters dynamically according to the detected goods type, enabling the same hardware to handle diverse goods without physical modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses sensors to detect goods properties and feeds this information back to the robot controller. This closed-loop feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt its gripping strategy in real-time based on the actual goods being handled, improving versatility while maintaining automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the robot handles heavy goods with high gripping force, then the gripping is secure, but fragile goods may be damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegripping reliabilityVSAvoidgoods damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the gripping force parameter based on the detected goods type. For heavy goods, higher gripping forces are applied to ensure secure holding, while for fragile goods, lower gripping forces prevent damage. This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction between gripping reliability and goods protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The gripping strategy is customized locally for each goods type rather than applying a uniform approach. The robot controller selects specific gripping parameters appropriate to the local characteristics of each goods category, enabling differentiated handling that protects fragile items while securely grasping heavy items.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If the robot operates at high speed for all goods, then productivity is high, but precision is reduced for fragile items

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling speedVSAvoidplacement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system varies the motion speed parameter according to goods type. High speeds are used for robust goods to maximize productivity, while reduced speeds are applied for fragile goods to ensure precise placement and prevent damage during transfer operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The robot system dynamically adjusts its operational speed based on real-time detection of goods properties. This dynamic speed adaptation allows the system to optimize productivity for suitable goods while maintaining precision for fragile items, rather than operating at a fixed speed for all scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Manufacturing precision

If specialized systems are used for different goods types, then handling precision is high, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a universal robot platform that can handle multiple goods types through software-based adaptation rather than requiring specialized hardware for each goods category. The robot controller uses detection data to select appropriate gripping strategies, enabling one system to perform the functions of multiple specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of creating physical copies of specialized systems for different goods types, the system uses virtual copying through software programs and control algorithms. Each goods type has an associated gripping strategy program that replicates the behavior of specialized systems without requiring specialized hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12037194B2Robot system with motion sequences adapted to product types, and operating method therefor
Publication Date: 2024.07.16 TGW LOGISTICS GMBH
  • US12037194B2 patent drawing
  • US12037194B2 patent drawing
  • US12037194B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot system includes a robot having a gripping unit for picking and placing down/throwing goods, wherein the goods are differentiated into multiple types with respect to their dimensional stability, compressive stability, flexural rigidity, strength, their absolute weight and/or specific weight. When the goods are manipulated, the robot and/or the gripping unit are controlled depending on the type determined for the goods. Moreover, a method operates the robot system.