Query-Adaptive Sample Selection for Efficient Data Item Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing neural network approaches for processing large numbers of data item samples, such as long video data, are either computationally expensive or limited by the number of samples they can process, often resulting in irrelevant or redundant data samples due to uniform downsampling or fixed subset selection, leading to variable performance and resource inefficiency.

Innovation Solution

Adaptive selection techniques using a selection neural network to generate relevance scores for both data item samples and placeholder samples, allowing for a dynamic selection of the most relevant subset to be processed by a task neural network, reducing unnecessary computation and improving accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If uniform downsampling is applied to reduce computational cost, then processing speed improves, but data item sample relevance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoiddata item sample relevance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the selection criterion from uniform random sampling to relevance-based sampling using selection scores. The selection neural network computes relevance scores for each data item sample based on the query, and samples are selected according to their scores rather than uniformly, thereby maintaining relevance while controlling the number of processed samples.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic adaptability by allowing the number of selected data item samples to vary based on query complexity and relevance. Instead of a fixed downsampling rate, the system dynamically determines how many samples to process by comparing selection scores against a baseline, enabling flexible adjustment between processing speed and relevance based on specific query requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If a fixed size subset of data item samples is selected, then computational complexity is reduced, but task performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational complexityVSAvoidtask performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a threshold-based selection mechanism where data item samples are selected if their selection score exceeds a baseline score. This partial selection approach processes only the necessary subset of samples above the threshold rather than a fixed size, balancing computational complexity reduction with maintaining sufficient task performance by including all potentially relevant samples.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes from fixed-size subset selection to variable-size selection based on relevance scores. The number of processed samples becomes a dynamic parameter determined by query-sample relevance rather than a static configuration, allowing the system to adapt the subset size to actual task requirements while controlling computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If all data item samples are processed, then accuracy is improved, but computational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccuracyVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and processes only the relevant data item samples by computing selection scores and filtering out irrelevant samples before processing. The selection neural network identifies and extracts the subset of samples that are actually relevant to the query, excluding irrelevant samples from the main task neural network processing, thereby reducing computational cost while maintaining accuracy on relevant data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary relevance assessment by computing selection scores for all data item samples before the main task processing. This preliminary filtering action identifies relevant samples in advance, allowing the main task neural network to focus computational resources only on relevant samples rather than processing all samples, thus reducing overall computational cost while preserving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4672031A1Adaptive sample selection for data item processing
Publication Date: 2025.12.31 GOOGLE LLC
  • EP4672031A1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP4672031A1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP4672031A1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatuses, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for receiving a query relating to a data item that includes multiple data item samples and processing the query and the data item to generate a response to the query. In particular, the described techniques include adaptively selecting a subset of the data item samples using a selection neural network conditioned on features of the data item samples and the query. Then processing the subset and query using a downstream task neural network to generate a response to the query. By adaptively selecting the subset of data item samples according to the query, the described techniques generate responses to queries that are more accurate and require less computation resources than would be the case using other techniques.