Adaptive Sample Selection for Query-Relevant Data Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing neural network approaches for processing large numbers of data item samples, such as long video data, are either computationally expensive or limited by the number of samples they can process, often resulting in irrelevant or redundant data samples due to uniform sampling or fixed subset selection, leading to variable performance and inefficient resource usage.

Innovation Solution

Adaptive selection techniques using a selection neural network to generate relevance scores for both data item samples and placeholder samples, allowing for a dynamic subset selection based on semantic relevance to the query, thereby reducing unnecessary processing and improving computational efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If uniform sampling or fixed subset selection is used to process large numbers of data item samples, then the processing can be simplified, but the computational cost becomes extremely expensive or the number of processable samples is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling complexityVSAvoidnumber of processable samples
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by replacing static fixed-size subset selection with a dynamic adaptive selection mechanism. The selection neural network dynamically determines the number and identity of samples to process based on the specific query and data item characteristics, allowing the system to adaptively adjust the processing scope rather than using a predetermined fixed size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of subset size from fixed to variable. Instead of processing a constant number of samples, the system varies the number of selected samples based on relevance scores generated by the selection neural network, enabling the system to handle different quantities of data item samples appropriately for each query.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If uniform downsampling is used to reduce data item samples, then the processing is straightforward, but redundant or irrelevant samples are included in the processed subset

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling process simplicityVSAvoidsample relevance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by treating each data item sample differently based on its individual relevance score. Instead of uniform treatment, the selection neural network assigns different selection probabilities to different samples based on their semantic relevance to the query, ensuring that more relevant samples are prioritized for processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the mechanical uniform sampling process with a neural-based semantic relevance assessment system. The selection neural network uses learned representations to evaluate and rank samples based on their semantic connection to the query, replacing simple random or fixed sampling with intelligent relevance-based selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If a fixed number of data item samples is selected for processing, then the approach is simple, but the performance becomes variable depending on whether the fixed number is sufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselection mechanism complexityVSAvoidadaptability to different data item-query pairs
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the selection mechanism dynamic by having the selection neural network determine the optimal number of samples to process based on the specific query and data item characteristics. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to adapt to varying requirements differentially between queries and data items, improving performance across diverse scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback through the selection neural network that continuously evaluates the relationship between queries and data item samples. The network uses the query context to generate relevance scores that feed back into the selection process, allowing the system to learn and adapt to different query-data item relationships over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250390532A1Adaptive sample selection for data item processing
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20250390532A1 patent drawing
  • US20250390532A1 patent drawing
  • US20250390532A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatuses, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for receiving a query relating to a data item that includes multiple data item samples and processing the query and the data item to generate a response to the query. In particular, the described techniques include adaptively selecting a subset of the data item samples using a selection neural network conditioned on features of the data item samples and the query. Then processing the subset and query using a downstream task neural network to generate a response to the query. By adaptively selecting the subset of data item samples according to the query, the described techniques generate responses to queries that are more accurate and require less computation resources than would be the case using other techniques.