Adaptive Screening System with Multi-Detector Feedback Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Screening checkpoints at locations where people congregate often become bottlenecks due to slow screening processes, leading to inefficiencies and long wait times.

Innovation Solution

A screening system with multiple detectors that adapt their functionality based on previous detections, utilizing a controller to correlate data and modify detection parameters, such as dwell time and detection libraries, to enhance detection performance and throughput.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional single-stage screening is used, then detection simplicity is maintained, but screening throughput is reduced and wait times increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescreening throughputVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The screening system is divided into multiple sequential detection stages (first detector, second detector, third detector) positioned at different locations along the conveyor path. Each detector performs specific analysis functions, with later detectors adapting their functionality based on findings from earlier detectors, thereby increasing throughput while managing complexity through modular functional segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second detector dynamically adapts its functionality based on findings from the first detector. The controller modifies detection parameters such as dwell time, illumination intensity, wavelength, spot size, detection threshold, and library of target compounds in real-time, transforming a static detection system into a dynamic one that optimizes performance and throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If detection parameters are fixed for all objects, then device operation is simplified, but detection accuracy for specific objects is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddetector operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where the controller receives findings from the first detector and uses this information to adjust the functionality of the second detector. This feedback mechanism enables adaptive optimization of detection accuracy for specific objects while maintaining automated operation, balancing precision with operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The controller dynamically changes detection parameters including dwell time, illumination intensity, wavelength, spot size, detection threshold, and library of target compounds based on findings from previous detectors. This parameter adaptation allows the system to optimize measurement precision for different objects without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If all objects receive full screening analysis, then detection completeness is ensured, but screening time per object increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection completenessVSAvoidscreening time per object
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The first detector performs preliminary screening and identification of objects of interest before they reach the second and third detectors. This preliminary action allows the system to focus subsequent detailed analysis only on objects that require it, ensuring detection completeness for high-priority items while reducing average screening time across all objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The second detector adapts its functionality by eliminating items from its detection library based on chemical information from the first detector, performing partial analysis only where needed. The third detector similarly focuses on specific second objects associated with flagged first objects, applying excessive action only to high-risk cases rather than uniformly to all objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Measurement precision

If multiple detectors are deployed in sequence, then detection accuracy is improved, but system complexity and coordination requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidmulti-detector system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller serves as a universal coordinating component that manages multiple detectors with different functionalities. It correlates data from the first, second, and third detectors, determines security risks, and dynamically adjusts detector parameters. This multi-functional controller simplifies the coordination complexity by providing a centralized intelligence that handles all inter-detector communications and adaptations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system increases screening throughput by integrating movement and detection, reducing wait times and improving the overall screening experience while enhancing detection accuracy and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

the chemical information gathered by the first detector is a fluorescent response of an analyte sampled from the given one of the one or more objects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluorescence: Fluorescence

Data Source

PatentEP3791151B1Screening system
Publication Date: 2025.04.02 CARRIER CORP
  • EP3791151B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3791151B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3791151B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An example screening system includes a plurality of detectors about a screening area. Each detector includes a sensor configured to detect information from one or more objects moving along a path from an entrance to an exit of the screening area. The plurality of detectors include a first detector configured to detect information from a first location of the path, and a second detector configured to detect information from a second location of the path. The second detector is configured to adapt its functionality based on a finding of the first detector for a given one of the one or more objects.