Adaptive Security Guidance for Code Error Remediation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Software developers often receive generic and irrelevant training, leading to inefficiencies and resource wastage, as existing training methods fail to provide tailored security skills relevant to their daily tasks and project requirements, resulting in potential security flaws in computer-readable code.

Innovation Solution

A system that assesses and customizes training for software developers by measuring their competence at various levels, identifying skill deficits, and providing adaptive security guidance through a management platform that includes observation, analysis, and remediation subsystems, ensuring relevant training is delivered based on real-time code analysis and user profiles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If generic training is provided to all software developers, then training coverage is improved, but training relevance and effectiveness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining coverageVSAvoidtraining relevance
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The training program is segmented into multiple specialized tracks (e.g., secure coding, vulnerability assessment, penetration testing, incident response) based on developer roles and project requirements. Each segment targets specific security competencies rather than providing uniform generic training to all developers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The training system dynamically adapts to individual developer needs by assessing current competence levels, analyzing project-specific security requirements, and continuously updating training recommendations. This dynamic adjustment ensures training remains relevant to current tasks and emerging security threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If comprehensive security training is provided, then security skills are improved, but time consumption and productivity deterioration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity skillsVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of requiring all developers to complete extensive comprehensive security training, the system provides partial training focused only on the specific security competencies needed for their current projects and roles. This targeted approach delivers sufficient security awareness without the time cost of exhaustive training programs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables developers to self-assess their security knowledge gaps and autonomously select appropriate training modules based on their project requirements and career goals. This self-directed learning approach eliminates mandatory training time while ensuring developers acquire necessary security skills.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional training methods are used, then training delivery is simplified, but training effectiveness and skill transfer deterioration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining deliveryVSAvoidskill transfer
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates continuous feedback mechanisms that track developer progress, assess comprehension through practical exercises, and measure skill application in real code reviews. This feedback loop ensures training effectiveness is monitored and adjusted, guaranteeing actual skill transfer rather than just completion of training modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional passive lecture-based training mechanics with interactive, practice-oriented learning experiences. Developers engage in hands-on security challenges, code analysis exercises, and simulated vulnerability exploitation scenarios that actively build practical skills rather than merely transmitting information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11900494B2Method and apparatus for adaptive security guidance
Publication Date: 2024.02.13 KCS EDUCATION SERVICES LTD
  • US11900494B2 patent drawing
  • US11900494B2 patent drawing
  • US11900494B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes processing computer readable code as the computer readable code is being written in a development environment to identify at least one error in the computer readable code. The method also includes searching a database for user profile information indicative of a training sequence performed by a user and a competence level assigned to the user. The competence level is based on a quantity of tasks included in the training sequence performed by the user free from error. The method also includes causing a graphical user interface to be displayed. The graphical user interface includes a concurrent display of the computer readable code having the at least one error, a preview of the computer readable code free from having the at least one error, and a remediation suggestion to correct the at least one error in the computer readable code based on the competence level.