Adaptive Security Posture Architecture for Faster Incident Response
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing cybersecurity systems face challenges such as lack of integrated incident response capabilities, complex procurement processes for third-party vendors, inadequate assessment of readiness, and inability to dynamically adapt to evolving threats and organizational changes, leading to delayed responses and increased vulnerabilities.
Innovation Solution
A customized cybersecurity framework that models an entity's security posture, connects it with appropriate vendors, and provides tailored protection plans, enabling dynamic monitoring and immediate response to potential threats, with features like vendor marketplaces and real-time status tracking.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If existing cybersecurity systems are used, then basic protection is provided, but response time is delayed and vulnerabilities increase due to lack of integrated incident response capabilities
Solution Approach 1:
The patent combines multiple previously separate cybersecurity functions (vulnerability assessment, threat detection, incident response, and vendor coordination) into a single integrated platform. This merging eliminates the time delays associated with switching between separate systems and enables seamless incident response workflows, directly resolving the contradiction between maintaining security effectiveness and reducing response time.
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs preliminary vulnerability assessments and threat detections continuously before incidents occur. By having vulnerabilities identified and documented in advance, and response protocols pre-established, the system can immediately activate remediation actions when threats are detected, significantly reducing incident response time while maintaining high security standards.
2Adaptability or versatility
If traditional procurement processes for third-party vendors are used, then vendor selection is possible, but the process becomes complex and time-consuming
Solution Approach 1:
The platform creates a universal vendor marketplace that serves multiple functions: vendor discovery, assessment, selection, contracting, and performance monitoring. This multi-functional approach consolidates what were previously separate procurement activities into a single streamlined process, reducing complexity while maintaining the ability to select appropriate vendors for different security needs.
Solution Approach 2:
The system enables automated vendor assessment and matching based on organizational security requirements. Vendors are pre-vetted and categorized within the platform, allowing organizations to self-select appropriate vendors without requiring complex manual evaluation processes, thereby simplifying the procurement workflow while ensuring adaptability to specific security needs.
3Stability of the object's composition
If static security measures are implemented, then initial security posture is established, but the system cannot dynamically adapt to evolving threats and organizational changes
Solution Approach 1:
The system transitions from static security configurations to dynamic, continuously adapting security postures. It automatically adjusts security controls, threat detection sensitivity, and response protocols based on real-time threat intelligence and organizational changes. This dynamic capability allows the system to maintain stable core security functions while adapting to evolving threats without requiring manual reconfiguration.
Solution Approach 2:
The platform implements continuous feedback loops where threat detection data, vulnerability assessment results, and incident response outcomes are automatically analyzed and used to adjust security measures. This feedback mechanism enables the system to learn from emerging threats and organizational changes, dynamically adapting security postures to maintain effectiveness against evolving attack vectors while preserving stability in core security operations.
Data Source
AI summary
Systems, methods, and computer-readable storage media. One system includes a readiness system configured to access or monitor one or more data storages, devices, applications, or endpoints associated with at least one of at least one entity computing system or computing network of an entity and determine a security posture of the entity based on entity data. The system includes an incident system configured to model, based on the security posture, at least one security risk or security vulnerability. The system includes an action system configured to execute one or more actions associated with the at least one entity computing system or the at least one entity computing network, and the one or more actions include at least one of (i) performing at least one remediation action, (ii) opening at least one readiness issue or gap, (iii) executing at least one underwriting, or (iv) providing at least one instruction.


