Adaptive Network Security Enforcement with Session Embeddings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network security policies are inflexible and often misconfigured, leading to inadequate or overly restrictive access control, with 99% of firewall breaches attributed to misconfiguration, and failing to adapt to changing network conditions and user/device-specific needs.

Innovation Solution

A computing system dynamically determines and implements security policies based on individual user, device, and application characteristics, adapting to real-time network conditions by generating embedding vectors from session attributes to tailor security measures proactively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If static and uniform security policies are implemented across the network, then security management is simplified and easier to enforce, but the security becomes inadequate for specific user needs and overly restrictive for low-risk users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of security policy implementationVSAvoidadaptability of security policies to user needs
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic security policies that automatically adjust based on real-time network conditions, user behavior patterns, and threat assessments. The system transitions from static configuration to dynamic adaptation by continuously monitoring network traffic and modifying security parameters without manual intervention, resolving the contradiction between ease of implementation and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes security parameters dynamically by adjusting policy strictness, access control levels, and monitoring intensity based on assessed risk levels. Different users receive different security parameter configurations automatically generated by the system, maintaining ease of management while achieving user-specific adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If manual configuration of security policies is used, then policy implementation is straightforward and controllable, but the system cannot adapt to changing network conditions and 99% of firewall breaches occur due to misconfiguration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of security policy configurationVSAvoidability to adapt to changing network conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-configuration by automatically generating, adjusting, and optimizing security policies based on monitored network data and threat intelligence. The automated system eliminates manual configuration errors while adapting to changing conditions, simultaneously improving reliability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where network traffic patterns, threat detections, and policy effectiveness metrics are monitored and fed back to automatically adjust security configurations. This closed-loop approach ensures accurate configuration that adapts to changing network conditions without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If uniform security policies are applied to all users and devices, then enforcement is consistent and simple, but high-value targets receive insufficient protection while low-risk users face unnecessary restrictions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of security enforcementVSAvoideffectiveness of security protection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies differentiated security measures to different users, devices, and network segments based on their specific risk profiles and value to the organization. High-value targets receive enhanced protection while low-risk users experience minimal restrictions, maintaining operational simplicity through automated differentiation rather than manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Device complexity

If static security policies are maintained, then system complexity is reduced and easier to manage, but the security measures become misconfigured over time and fail to prevent modern threats

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplexity of security policy managementVSAvoideffectiveness of security against modern threats
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains low management complexity while achieving high effectiveness by implementing dynamic policy adjustment that occurs automatically without increasing administrative burden. The dynamic system adapts to new threats and network conditions autonomously, preventing the security stagnation that occurs with static policies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12452305B2Adaptive enforcement of security within a network
Publication Date: 2025.10.21 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US12452305B2 patent drawing
  • US12452305B2 patent drawing
  • US12452305B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system receives one or more ingress data packets from a client device or a user in a network. The system obtains attributes, via packet inspection, from the one or more ingress data packets, and determines one or more embedding vectors from the attributes. The one or more embedding vectors represent a status of a session during which the ingress data packets are obtained. The system transmits the one or more embedding vectors as inputs to a trained machine learning model. The system infers, using the trained machine learning mode, one or more security policies based on the embedding vectors. The system provides or implementing the one or more security policies.