Adaptive Security Signing for Connected Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current connected vehicle technologies face challenges in efficiently managing large volumes of data and ensuring security, particularly with the IEEE 1609.2 standard's signing and verification processes, which can lead to processor overload and missed alerts due to constant message verification and signing requirements.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an adaptive security signing and verification methodology, using adaptive certificate attachment and verification strategies based on vehicle dynamics and received vehicle monitoring, reduces the frequency of certificate attachment and verification, and an adaptive node filtering method that adjusts communication range and power thresholds based on signal strength and noise levels to filter out undesired nodes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If constant message verification and signing is performed according to IEEE 1609.2 standard, then security is improved, but processor load increases and alerts may be missed

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidprocessor load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of verification and signing frequencies based on vehicle dynamics and environmental conditions. The system transitions from constant verification to adaptive verification, where the frequency is modulated according to factors such as vehicle speed, acceleration, and proximity to other vehicles, thereby reducing processor load while maintaining security during critical maneuvers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by adjusting certificate attachment frequency and verification intervals based on real-time conditions. When vehicle dynamics indicate stable operation, the system reduces verification frequency; when dynamics indicate critical changes, verification frequency increases, optimizing the balance between security and processor utilization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of information

If all received vehicle data is processed, then data completeness is improved, but bandwidth usage increases and unnecessary data consumes processing resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata completenessVSAvoidbandwidth usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality filtering by evaluating the relevance and importance of individual data elements from received vehicles based on spatial proximity, relative velocity, and contextual safety significance. Only data elements meeting specific quality thresholds are processed and transmitted, eliminating unnecessary data while preserving critical information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial processing by selectively handling only the most critical portions of received data. Instead of processing all received vehicle data uniformly, the system identifies and processes only high-priority data elements such as emergency brake events or collision warnings, while filtering out redundant information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9559804B2Connected vehicles adaptive security signing and verification methodology and node filtering
Publication Date: 2017.01.31 HARMAN INT IND INC
  • US9559804B2 patent drawing
  • US9559804B2 patent drawing
  • US9559804B2 patent drawing

AI summary

We introduce a connected vehicles adaptive security signing and verification methodology. We also introduce an adaptive node filtering at receiver, using noise levels and received signal strength. This invention addresses two important pillars in connected vehicle technology and autonomous cars: The first one is related to the security 1609.2 format and its main two functions: signing and verification. The second one explains how the noise level and signal strength can be used to filter undesired connected nodes. In this presentation, we provide various examples and variations on these topics.