Adaptive Seismic Horizon Tracking Across Multi-Wave Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing seismic horizon auto-tracking methods face challenges in precision and adaptability due to varying seismic wave types, propagation velocities, and differing resolutions and sampling intervals in multi-wave and multi-domain seismic data, leading to difficulties in setting optimal horizon tracking parameters.

Innovation Solution

A multi-wave and multi-domain adaptive seismic horizon auto-tracking method that dynamically adjusts horizon tracking parameters based on seismic relative resolution, using iterative calculations and curve fitting to identify horizon points without presetting window sizes, suitable for both time-domain and depth-domain seismic data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional horizon tracking parameters are used, then the method is simple to operate, but the precision and adaptability deteriorate due to varying seismic wave types and propagation velocities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehorizon tracking precisionVSAvoidparameter setting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of horizon tracking parameters based on real-time seismic waveform characteristics. The system automatically modifies search window sizes, sampling intervals, and tracking parameters according to the detected seismic wave type, propagation velocity, and resolution, transforming static parameters into dynamic adaptive parameters that evolve with the seismic data characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically changes multiple parameters including search window size, sampling interval, wave type identification thresholds, and propagation velocity models based on the analyzed seismic characteristics. By adjusting these parameters dynamically, the system adapts to different seismic datasets without requiring manual reconfiguration, resolving the contradiction between precision and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If fixed window sizes are used for horizon tracking, then the operation is simplified, but the adaptability deteriorates across different seismic resolutions and sampling intervals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different seismic dataVSAvoidparameter setting ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically analyzing seismic waveform characteristics and adjusting its own parameters without external intervention. The algorithm independently identifies wave types, measures propagation velocities, determines optimal search window sizes, and configures sampling intervals, eliminating the need for user input or manual parameter setting while maintaining high adaptability across diverse seismic datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-establishing a comprehensive parameter adjustment framework and pre-calculating optimal parameter values based on seismic characteristics before the actual horizon tracking begins. The system pre-analyzes the seismic data to determine appropriate search window sizes and sampling intervals in advance, enabling seamless adaptive tracking without requiring user configuration during execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If manual horizon picking is used, then the precision can be controlled, but the productivity deteriorates due to time-consuming processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehorizon tracking efficiencyVSAvoidhorizon tracking accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the system continuously monitors the quality of horizon tracking results and adjusts parameters accordingly. The algorithm analyzes the consistency and accuracy of detected horizons in real-time, providing feedback to modify search window sizes, sampling intervals, and tracking algorithms dynamically. This closed-loop feedback enables the system to maintain high precision while processing large datasets efficiently, automating what would otherwise require time-consuming manual verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260050097A1Multi-wave and multi-domain adaptive seismic horizon auto-tracking method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 CHINA NAT PETROLEUM CORP
  • US20260050097A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050097A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050097A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a multi-wave and multi-domain adaptive seismic horizon auto-tracking method and apparatus. The multi-wave and multi-domain adaptive seismic horizon auto-tracking method comprises: importing seismic data, and setting a seed point on the seismic data; determining a seismic relative resolution according to a seismic waveform of a seismic trace where the seed point is located; determining horizon tracking parameters according to the seismic relative resolution; determining a horizon point according to the horizon tracking parameters and the seismic trace where the seed point is located; replacing the seed point with the horizon point, and performing corresponding iterative calculation to obtain a plurality of horizon points in one-to-one correspondence with the seismic traces in the seismic data; and combining horizon values corresponding to the plurality of horizon points into seismic horizon data and exporting the seismic horizon data.