Adaptive Semiconductor Tester Analysis System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current semiconductor testing processes face challenges with resource wastage, increased costs, and inefficiencies due to inadequate monitoring and control of Automated Test Equipment (ATE) stations, leading to semiconductor product loss, extended test times, and labor costs.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for processing test results from multiple semiconductor testers using Statistical Process Control (SPC) and Adaptive Test methodologies, which analyze test data to identify issues such as environmental, calibration, and manufacturing variability, and dynamically adjust testing schedules and parameters to optimize testing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual monitoring and control methods are used for ATE stations, then operational simplicity is maintained, but resource wastage increases and testing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting efficiencyVSAvoidresource wastage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously collects test data from multiple ATE stations and environmental sensors, analyzes the data to detect deviations from optimal performance, and automatically adjusts testing parameters and environmental controls. This closed-loop feedback mechanism eliminates resource wastage by responding dynamically to actual testing conditions rather than relying on manual monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The adaptive testing system autonomously optimizes test parameters, identifies and isolates faulty components, and adjusts environmental conditions without human intervention. The system serves itself by automatically detecting issues and implementing corrective actions, thereby improving productivity while reducing resource consumption associated with manual operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If traditional testing processes are used without adaptive control, then system complexity is minimized, but test time increases and product quality decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct qualityVSAvoidtest time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts testing parameters based on real-time analysis of test data and environmental conditions. Test sequences, parameters, and environmental settings are continuously optimized during the testing process rather than remaining static, enabling faster identification of defective products while maintaining high quality standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The adaptive testing system modifies test parameters such as voltage levels, frequency ranges, and measurement thresholds based on analyzed test results and environmental feedback. This dynamic parameter adjustment accelerates testing by focusing resources on critical measurements while maintaining product quality through data-driven parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If environmental conditions are not actively controlled, then operational complexity is reduced, but tester calibration accuracy and measurement precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetester calibration accuracyVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Environmental sensors continuously monitor temperature, humidity, and other conditions affecting tester calibration. The system analyzes this environmental data and automatically adjusts environmental controls or compensates for variations in the testing algorithm, maintaining measurement precision while managing complexity through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces environmental sensors and control mechanisms as intermediaries between the testing environment and the ATE stations. These intermediaries measure and regulate environmental conditions, isolating the testers from environmental variations and preserving measurement precision without requiring complex manual environmental management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8855959B2Integrated cross-tester analysis and real-time adaptive test
Publication Date: 2014.10.07 GLOBALFOUNDRIES US INC
  • US8855959B2 patent drawing
  • US8855959B2 patent drawing
  • US8855959B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Processing test results from a plurality of individual semiconductor testers by analyzing each test result at an adaptive test engine. A centralized system jointly analyzes all the test results from the plurality of individual semiconductor testers. The adaptive test engine or the centralized system identifies, based on the analysis of each test result or the joint analysis of all the test results, one or more of: a test environmental issue, a tester variability issue, a tester calibration issue, a product variability issue, and a manufacturing process variability issue. The adaptive test engine or the centralized system determines whether one or more of the plurality of individual semiconductor testers causes one or more of the identified issues or whether semiconductor products tested by the plurality of individual semiconductor testers causes one or more of the identified issues.