Adaptive Shading and Illumination via 3D Person Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current shading and illumination systems in buildings struggle to balance visual comfort and energy efficiency, particularly in preventing glare and excessive heating, while also considering individual user preferences and environmental factors.

Innovation Solution

A shading and illumination system that uses a control unit to determine an individual light parameter for each person in the room based on their viewing direction, position, and a 3D image of the room, as well as external parameters such as irradiance and temperature, to actuate shading devices and illumination devices accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If the entire façade is closed to implement glare protection, then glare protection is improved, but daylight illuminance levels decrease and contact with the outside world is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveglare protectionVSAvoiddaylight illuminance levels
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The shading device is divided into multiple independently controllable shading elements (e.g., lamellae, panels, or zones) that can be adjusted individually or in groups. This segmentation allows selective shading of specific areas to block glare while maintaining daylight in other areas, resolving the contradiction between glare protection and daylight availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the façade receive different shading treatments based on local glare conditions and viewing directions. The system applies localized shading control rather than uniform closure, ensuring glare protection where needed while preserving daylight illuminance in areas where it is beneficial.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of energy

If presence detection is used for basic control, then energy efficiency is improved, but visual comfort and individualized control are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveartificial light requirementVSAvoidindividualized lighting control
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static presence detection to dynamic control that continuously adapts to changing conditions including individual user positions, viewing directions, and environmental factors. This dynamic approach enables personalized lighting control while maintaining energy efficiency through real-time optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates multiple sensors (cameras, light sensors, temperature sensors) that continuously monitor room conditions, user positions, and environmental parameters. This feedback is processed to automatically adjust shading and illumination devices, achieving both energy efficiency and individualized visual comfort control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If conventional shading control is used without considering viewing direction, then system complexity is reduced, but visual ergonomics and individual comfort deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidvisual ergonomics
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects user positions and viewing directions using cameras and sensors, then autonomously adjusts shading devices without requiring manual user input. This self-service approach maintains low operational complexity while significantly improving visual ergonomics through personalized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical control with automated optical and electronic detection systems (cameras, sensors) that track user positions and calculate optimal shading configurations. This substitution reduces operational complexity while enhancing visual comfort through precise, individualized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12320496B2Shading and illumination system
Publication Date: 2025.06.03 HELLA SONNEN UND WETTERSCHUTZTECHN
  • US12320496B2 patent drawing
  • US12320496B2 patent drawing
  • US12320496B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A shading and illumination system includes a shading device for shading viewing openings, an illumination device for illuminating a room, an external sensor for detecting an external parameter acting on the room, an internal sensor for detecting a 3D image of the room, a position of a person present in the room in the 3D image, and a viewing direction of the person, and a control unit for actuating the shading device and the illumination device. The shading device and the illumination device are actuatable depending on the values measured by the external sensor and by the internal sensor. A light parameter acting on the person is determinable depending on the detected viewing direction, on the detected position, on the 3D image of the room, and on the external parameter. The shading device and/or the illumination device are/is actuatable depending on the light parameter acting on the person.