Adaptive Ship Steering Control for Cargo and Weather Changes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autopilot systems for ships rely on fixed control parameters for rudder angle, which fail to adapt to changes in cargo weight and weather conditions, leading to reduced control accuracy and excessive steering.

Innovation Solution

An automatic steering device that acquires a ship's traveling state and information, calculates evaluation values for direction maintaining performance and ship handling control, and sets adaptive control parameters to stabilize ship control based on these evaluations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If fixed control parameters are used for rudder angle, then the control system is simple to operate, but the control accuracy deteriorates and excessive steering occurs when cargo weight or weather conditions change

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system operationVSAvoidcontrol accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control parameters are changed from fixed values to dynamically adjustable values that adapt to changing ship conditions. The system automatically adjusts control parameters based on real-time evaluation of ship state and environmental factors, transforming the static control system into a dynamic one that maintains optimal performance across varying operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the control parameters from fixed values to variable values that are continuously adjusted based on ship conditions. By monitoring ship state parameters and environmental factors, the system modifies control parameters in real-time to maintain optimal control accuracy and prevent excessive steering under different cargo weights and weather conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If fixed control parameters are used, then the device complexity is low, but the adaptability to different cargo weights and weather conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidadaptability to cargo weight and weather
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs self-adjustment by automatically evaluating ship state and environmental conditions, then autonomously modifying control parameters without external intervention. This self-service capability enables the system to adapt to varying cargo weights and weather conditions while maintaining reasonable complexity through automated decision-making algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where control parameters are continuously adjusted based on evaluation results from ship state sensors and environmental monitors. The feedback loop compares actual performance with desired performance and automatically modifies control parameters to optimize adaptability to different operating conditions while managing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If adaptive control parameters are implemented, then the control accuracy improves, but the device complexity increases due to additional evaluation and adjustment mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into distinct functional modules: ship state acquisition, environmental information acquisition, evaluation value calculation, and control parameter adjustment. This segmentation allows each module to perform its specific function independently, improving control accuracy through specialized processing while managing overall system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If evaluation values are continuously calculated and control parameters adjusted, then the adaptability to environmental changes improves, but the energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to environmental changesVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs evaluation and control parameter adjustment at periodic intervals rather than continuously. By sampling ship state and environmental conditions at optimized time intervals, the system maintains adaptability to environmental changes while significantly reducing computational load and energy consumption compared to continuous monitoring and adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12330762B2Automatic steering device, automatic steering system, automatic steering method, and automatic steering program
Publication Date: 2025.06.17 FURUNO ELECTRIC CO LTD
  • US12330762B2 patent drawing
  • US12330762B2 patent drawing
  • US12330762B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automatic steering device includes an acquirer, and processing circuitry. The acquirer acquires a traveling state including a heading or a position of a ship, and ship information on the ship. The processing circuitry calculates a first evaluation value that is an evaluation value indicative of a performance for maintaining the heading of the ship or a route based on the traveling state. The processing circuitry calculates a second evaluation value that is an evaluation value related to a ship handling control based on the ship information. The processing circuitry sets a control parameter related to a motion control of the ship based on the first evaluation value or the second evaluation value.