Adaptive Shutdown Routine for Handheld Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic devices lack an efficient method to determine and optimize shutdown routines based on user characteristics and ambient conditions, leading to suboptimal power management and user experience, particularly in transitioning to sleep mode.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for determining an optimized shutdown routine for handheld devices by analyzing user characteristics, such as biometric data and device usage patterns, and ambient conditions, to adjust display settings and power consumption, including the use of sensors like accelerometers, cameras, and ambient light sensors to detect user activity and intent.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the device uses a fixed shutdown routine, then the shutdown process is simple and predictable, but it cannot adapt to different user needs and ambient conditions, leading to suboptimal power management and user experience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability of shutdown routineVSAvoidcomplexity of shutdown routine
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shutdown routine transitions from a fixed, static process to a dynamic, adaptive process that changes based on real-time sensor inputs and user behavior patterns. The system continuously adjusts shutdown parameters (timing, display dimming rate, audio fading) based on detected ambient conditions and user state, making the routine flexible rather than rigid.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device autonomously determines when to shutdown and how to execute the shutdown routine by analyzing its own sensor data and usage patterns without requiring explicit user commands. The system self-adjusts the shutdown behavior based on detected conditions such as ambient light levels, device orientation, and user interaction patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Use of energy by moving object

If the device shuts down quickly to conserve power, then energy efficiency is improved, but it may interrupt user activities or fail to provide adequate transition time for sleep preparation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoiduser experience during shutdown
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device initiates preparatory actions before the actual shutdown occurs, such as gradually dimming the display, fading out audio, and providing haptic feedback to signal the upcoming shutdown. This preliminary transition phase allows users to mentally prepare for the shutdown while the device begins power-saving measures in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The shutdown routine employs periodic, staged transitions rather than an abrupt single action. The device progresses through multiple phases (warning period, gradual dimming, intermediate pause, final shutdown) with adjustable timing between each phase, allowing flexibility in balancing speed and user comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Ease of operation

If the device extends the shutdown routine to provide better user experience, then user satisfaction is improved, but power consumption increases and shutdown efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experience during shutdownVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The device applies different transition characteristics to different components during shutdown based on their individual requirements. For example, the display may be dimmed rapidly while audio fades slowly, or certain background processes are terminated immediately while others are allowed to complete. This localized optimization ensures each component transitions appropriately without unnecessary energy waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts shutdown parameters (timing, intensity, rate of change) based on detected conditions such as ambient light levels, device orientation, and user behavior patterns. When quick shutdown is appropriate, parameters are optimized for speed; when user comfort is priority, parameters are adjusted for gentler transitions, achieving energy efficiency without sacrificing user experience in either scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If the device uses sensors and analysis to optimize shutdown routines, then adaptability and user experience are improved, but device complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device leverages existing multi-functional components (sensors, processors, display, audio systems) already present for other purposes and applies them to shutdown optimization. The same ambient light sensor used for display brightness adjustment is also used to determine shutdown timing; the same processor that runs the operating system also analyzes usage patterns for shutdown prediction, eliminating the need for dedicated specialized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9874933B1Device shutdown routine optimization
Publication Date: 2018.01.23 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US9874933B1 patent drawing
  • US9874933B1 patent drawing
  • US9874933B1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure is directed to creation of a shutdown routine for an electronic device. A device may detect, via one or more sensors, one or more conditions associated with the environment of the handheld electronic device to optimize a shutdown routine for a particular use case. For instance, the user may be using the device to aid in the process of falling asleep and the shutdown routine may be optimized to aid that process. In addition, the system may monitor user interaction after an optimized shutdown routine has been executed to determine an effectiveness of the optimized routine for the particular use case. Optimized shutdown routines may be associated with the one or more conditions and used as a baseline for future use cases of the user or other users where similar conditions are detected.