Adaptive Medical Signal Reconstruction for Variable Sampling Rates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical signal processing systems face inefficiencies due to over-sampling and redundant data acquisition, particularly in capturing fast activity wave portions and handling noise, which limits sampling control and sensitivity, especially in nonlinear and non-stationary signals.

Innovation Solution

A patient medical signal processing system that employs adaptive data sampling and acquisition with varying sampling rates based on signal intrinsic characteristics, using nonlinear and non-uniform sampling to capture real-time dynamic signals, and interpolates data to reconstruct medical signals efficiently, reducing data conversion time and resource burden.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If linear and uniform sampling is used to achieve adequate signal quality, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to over-sampling and excessive data generation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal qualityVSAvoiddata processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the sampling rate based on the instantaneous frequency content of the medical signal. During high-frequency events (e.g., QRS complexes), the sampling rate increases to capture rapid changes, while during low-frequency portions, the sampling rate decreases to reduce data generation. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by maintaining measurement precision only when and where it is needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The sampling rate parameter is changed adaptively based on signal characteristics. The system monitors signal frequency content and modifies the sampling rate parameter in real-time, increasing it during high-frequency events and decreasing it during low-frequency portions. This parameter change strategy maintains adequate signal quality while significantly reducing overall data generation and processing burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If high sampling rate is used to capture fast activity wave portions, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of substance worsens due to excessive data generation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of fast activityVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies high sampling quality locally only during fast activity wave portions (such as QRS complexes) where it is truly needed, while using lower sampling quality during slower signal portions. This local quality approach ensures adequate detection of critical fast events while avoiding the generation of excessive data during periods when high sampling precision is not required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of applying high sampling rate continuously (excessive action), the system applies it partially only during high-frequency events. This partial action strategy captures all necessary fast activity details while avoiding the waste of generating and processing excessive data during low-frequency portions, thus resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and data volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If linear sampling is used for data acquisition, then ease of operation is improved, but adaptability deteriorates in the presence of noise and non-stationary signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling controlVSAvoidsignal processing flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor signal characteristics (frequency content, amplitude variations) and automatically adjust the sampling rate in response. This feedback loop enables the system to adapt to non-stationary signals and noise conditions without complex manual intervention, maintaining ease of operation while significantly improving adaptability to varying signal conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The sampling system transitions from static linear sampling to dynamic adaptive sampling. The sampling rate becomes a dynamic parameter that automatically adjusts to signal conditions, enabling the system to handle non-stationary signals and noise effectively. This dynamic approach maintains operational simplicity while dramatically improving adaptability to diverse and changing signal characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8891713B2System for adaptive sampled medical signal interpolative reconstruction for use in patient monitoring
Publication Date: 2014.11.18 PIXART IMAGING INC
  • US8891713B2 patent drawing
  • US8891713B2 patent drawing
  • US8891713B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A patient medical signal processing system adaptively reconstructs a medical signal sampled using a varying sampling rate. The system includes an input processor and a signal processor. The input processor receives first data and second data. The first data represents a first portion of a medical signal derived by sampling at a first sampling rate and the second data represents a second portion of the medical signal derived by sampling at a second sampling rate. The first and the second sampling rates are different and comprise a master clock rate or an integer division of the master clock rate. A signal processor provides a reconstructed sampled medical signal by, interpolating the second data to provide third data at the first sampling rate and combining the first data and the third data to provide the reconstructed sampled medical signal.