Sequential Task Training with Adaptive Skill Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine training programs struggle to distinguish between sub-skills performed concurrently and often spend excessive training time testing specific sub-skills rather than broader concepts, leading to inefficiencies in improving machine operation performance.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing machine learning and conceptual teaching to assign performance scores for each skill in a sequential task, identify areas for improvement, and adapt training scenarios based on new performance scores, thereby tailoring training to individual performance needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing tutorial programs test specific sub-skills extensively, then measurement precision of sub-skill performance is improved, but loss of time increases due to excessive testing rather than broader concept training

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesub-skill performance measurementVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the training evaluation into distinct phases (approach, maneuver, landing) and sub-skills within each phase, allowing targeted assessment without exhaustive testing of all sub-skills. This segmentation enables the system to identify specific areas needing improvement while maintaining overall training efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the parameters being measured based on performance thresholds. When a student achieves proficiency in certain sub-skills, the system adjusts which parameters continue to be monitored and which can be reduced, thereby reducing time loss while maintaining measurement precision for critical skills.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If adaptive training programs use comprehensive models of human memory (ACT-R), then adaptability to individual student needs is improved, but device complexity increases due to complex modeling requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining program adaptabilityVSAvoidmodeling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a comprehensive ACT-R model, the system segments the student model into simpler components: performance scores for each sub-skill, phase completion status, and identified areas for improvement. This segmentation maintains adaptability to individual needs while significantly reducing the complexity of the underlying model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts only the essential elements needed for adaptive training from complex cognitive models. Rather than implementing full ACT-R memory models, it extracts performance measurement and progression tracking capabilities, eliminating unnecessary complexity while preserving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Productivity

If machine learning is used to analyze student capabilities and optimize training, then productivity of training delivery is improved, but difficulty of detecting and measuring student understanding worsens due to complexity of ML implementation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining optimization efficiencyVSAvoidstudent capability measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments student capability measurement into discrete, quantifiable metrics: performance scores for specific sub-skills, phase completion indicators, and identified improvement areas. This segmentation makes student understanding detectable and measurable through straightforward data collection rather than complex ML analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where performance scores are immediately calculated and used to identify areas for improvement. This feedback mechanism enables productive training optimization through simple, actionable metrics rather than complex hidden student models, making both measurement and optimization more transparent and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12265762B1Human machine teaching system for sequential task training
Publication Date: 2025.04.01 HRL LAB
  • US12265762B1 patent drawing
  • US12265762B1 patent drawing
  • US12265762B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described is a system for improving machine operation performance. The system assigns and displays, on an interface having multiple interactive controls, a performance score for each skill of a sequential task in a simulation of operation of a machine. Based on the performance scores, one or more skills to improve with targeted training are identified and displayed on the interface. A training scenario of skills to perform via the interactive controls in a subsequent simulation is recommended to improve the performance scores. Following performance of the training scenario in the subsequent simulation, the system assigns and displays, on the interface, a new performance score for each skill performed. The training scenario is adapted based on the new performance scores.