Adaptive SLAM Parameter Tuning for Highway Localization Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face inaccuracies in localization and mapping due to varying environmental conditions, which can impact their safe and efficient operation, particularly in environments like highways where SLAM algorithms may produce poor maps.

Innovation Solution

Dynamic adjustment of parameters in the localization and mapping component based on conditions such as environment classification and sensor data quality, using hyperparameter optimization and lookup tables to improve map clarity and accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If SLAM algorithm uses fixed parameters for localization and mapping, then the system complexity is low, but the measurement precision deteriorates in varying environmental conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocalization accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic parameter adjustment by continuously adapting SLAM algorithm parameters based on real-time environmental conditions and sensor data quality. The system transitions from fixed parameters to dynamically adjusted parameters, allowing the localization and mapping performance to adapt to varying conditions such as different environments (city blocks, highways, tunnels) and sensor qualities, thereby resolving the contradiction between maintaining low system complexity and achieving high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent directly applies parameter changes by modifying SLAM algorithm parameters based on environmental classification and sensor data quality assessment. The system identifies optimal parameter sets for different conditions and adjusts parameters dynamically, which improves measurement precision without requiring complete system redesign, thus balancing the trade-off between accuracy and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If SLAM algorithm processes sensor data with high detail, then the manufacturing precision of the map is improved, but the loss of time increases due to computational load

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemap accuracyVSAvoidcomputational processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively processing sensor data at different levels of detail based on environmental conditions and navigation requirements. Rather than always processing all sensor data with maximum detail, the system adjusts the level of processing based on what is necessary for the current situation, reducing unnecessary computational load while maintaining map accuracy where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the processing detail and computational intensity based on real-time conditions. When environmental conditions are favorable or navigation requirements are modest, the system reduces processing detail to save time. When high accuracy is needed or conditions are challenging, the system increases processing detail, creating a dynamic balance between map accuracy and computational time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If SLAM algorithm uses adaptive parameter adjustment, then the reliability of localization is improved in varying conditions, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocalization reliabilityVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements parameter changes by adjusting SLAM algorithm parameters based on environmental classification (e.g., city block, highway, tunnel) and sensor data quality metrics. This targeted parameter adjustment improves localization reliability across different conditions without requiring complete algorithmic redesign, thus managing the complexity-reliability trade-off effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring environmental conditions and sensor data quality, then using this information to adjust parameters. The feedback loop enables the system to adapt to varying conditions and maintain reliable localization, with the complexity managed through structured feedback processing rather than uncontrolled algorithmic complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Manufacturing precision

If the system processes more sensor data for better map quality, then the purity of the map increases, but the productivity of navigation decreases due to slower reaction time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemap qualityVSAvoidnavigation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by processing only the necessary amount of sensor data required for adequate map quality in each situation. Rather than processing all available sensor data uniformly, the system selectively processes data based on environmental conditions and navigation needs, improving map quality where necessary while maintaining navigation speed by avoiding unnecessary processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11079492B1Condition dependent parameters for large-scale localization and/or mapping
Publication Date: 2021.08.03 ZOOX INC
  • US11079492B1 patent drawing
  • US11079492B1 patent drawing
  • US11079492B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle may include a localization and/or mapping component to understand what surrounds the autonomous vehicle and where it is in relation to the surroundings. The localization and/or mapping component may receive sensor data from sensor(s) of the vehicle and generate a map and/or position and/or orientation from the sensor data according to parameters that configure the way the localization and/or mapping component generates the map and/or position/orientation. A computing device may dynamically adjust these parameters, thereby changing the way the map and/or position/orientation are generated. This adjustment may be based on a condition detected from the sensor data and may increase a clarity (e.g., degree of distinctness/clarity) of the generated map and/or position/orientation.