Adaptive Spatial Mode Sorter for Sub-Rayleigh Source Resolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional imaging methods, such as those employing a digital focal plane followed by electronic-domain post-processing, are inefficient for resolving features smaller than the Rayleigh diffraction limit, particularly in estimating sub-Rayleigh spaced incoherent point sources.

Innovation Solution

The method involves a spatial mode sorter that receives optical signals and processes them using eigen-projections and Bayesian prior probability distributions to configure the spatial mode sorter, enabling adaptive measurement and super-resolution imaging by projecting optical signals onto a basis of computed eigen-projections, leveraging quantum information theory for enhanced performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional digital focal plane imaging is used, then the imaging system is simple to operate, but it cannot resolve features smaller than the Rayleigh diffraction limit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolutionVSAvoidimaging system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spatial mode sorter is dynamically reconfigurable, allowing the basis functions to be adaptively adjusted based on the statistical properties of the optical sources. This dynamic adaptation enables the system to optimize resolution for different source configurations while maintaining operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the measurement basis from traditional intensity detection to spatial mode projections defined by eigenfunctions of the source distribution. By transforming the detection parameter space to match the statistical characteristics of the sources, the system achieves super-resolution capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If adaptive measurement with spatial mode sorting is implemented, then sub-Rayleigh resolution is achieved, but the processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolutionVSAvoidsignal processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary characterization of the optical source distribution to determine the statistical parameters before conducting the actual imaging measurement. This preliminary step allows the spatial mode sorter to be pre-configured with the appropriate basis functions, simplifying the subsequent measurement process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the detected optical signals to iteratively refine the estimation of source distribution parameters. The measured statistics are fed back to update the spatial mode sorter configuration, creating an adaptive loop that progressively improves resolution accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If eigen-projection based spatial mode sorting is used, then high-resolution measurement is achieved, but the measurement time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement resolutionVSAvoiddetection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The imaging process is divided into periodic cycles: first characterizing the source distribution statistics, then configuring the spatial mode sorter with the corresponding eigenbasis, and finally performing the high-resolution measurement. This periodic structure allows optimization of each phase separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The statistical characterization of the optical source distribution is performed in advance before the actual imaging measurement. This preliminary action enables the system to pre-compute the optimal spatial mode basis, reducing the time required during the critical measurement phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240160001A1Managing adaptive measurement for high-resolution measurement
Publication Date: 2024.05.16 THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIV OF ARIZONA
  • US20240160001A1 patent drawing
  • US20240160001A1 patent drawing
  • US20240160001A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Imaging a distribution of one or more optical sources includes: receiving respective optical signals from a spatial mode sorter during each of two or more detection intervals of time; after each of the two or more detection intervals of time, processing information based at least in part on: (1) the respective optical signal received in the corresponding detection interval of time, and (2) a first set of models comprising a set of distributions related to one or more optical sources, each model corresponding to a different number of optical sources in the distribution, and configuring the spatial mode sorter based at least in part on the processing; and providing an estimated measurement characterizing the distribution of one or more optical sources based at least in part on the processed information. The processing after at least one of the two or more detection intervals of time includes computing an eigen-projection.