Adaptive Speech Enhancement for Intelligibility With Minimal Artifacts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing speech enhancement algorithms in noisy environments degrade audio quality with audible artifacts, compromising speech intelligibility, especially in critical communication scenarios like rescue operations.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method optimizes speech enhancement parameters based on real-time intelligibility and quality targets, using a closed-form algorithm to adapt to noise conditions, minimizing artifacts and ensuring high speech intelligibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If speech enhancement processing is applied to improve speech intelligibility in noisy environments, then speech intelligibility is improved, but audible artifacts are introduced and audio quality is degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeech intelligibilityVSAvoidaudible artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes parameters of a predetermined speech enhancement algorithm by calculating a measure of speech intelligibility and adjusting algorithm parameters to meet a speech intelligibility target while minimizing audio quality degradation. This involves changing parameters such as enhancement gain, filtering characteristics, and processing intensity to achieve the desired balance between intelligibility and quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The speech enhancement algorithm is made adaptive by continuously monitoring the acoustic environment and dynamically adjusting its parameters based on current noise conditions. The system calculates speech intelligibility measures in real-time and modifies enhancement strength accordingly, allowing it to provide strong enhancement when needed while reducing or eliminating enhancement when speech intelligibility is already sufficient, thereby minimizing artifacts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If speech enhancement processing is applied to enhance speech intelligibility, then speech intelligibility is improved, but processing complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeech intelligibilityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a predetermined speech enhancement algorithm that has been pre-configured with optimized processing steps and parameter settings. By preparing the enhancement framework in advance with predetermined structures and optimization criteria, the system reduces real-time computational complexity while maintaining effective speech intelligibility enhancement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex iterative optimization mechanisms with a closed-form optimization algorithm that directly calculates optimal enhancement parameters based on measured speech intelligibility. This substitution of computational mechanics simplifies the processing requirements and reduces device complexity while achieving the same enhancement objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If speech enhancement processing is applied to improve speech intelligibility in noisy environments, then speech intelligibility is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeech intelligibilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies speech enhancement processing selectively and adaptively based on measured speech intelligibility levels. Instead of continuously applying full-strength enhancement, the system adjusts the degree of processing to provide only the necessary enhancement to meet intelligibility targets. This partial action approach reduces unnecessary computational operations and lowers power consumption while maintaining adequate speech intelligibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Measurement precision

If speech enhancement processing is applied to enhance speech intelligibility, then speech intelligibility is improved, but processing delay increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeech intelligibilityVSAvoidprocessing delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a predetermined speech enhancement algorithm with pre-configured processing steps and pre-optimized parameter sets. By having the enhancement framework prepared in advance with predetermined structures, the system minimizes real-time processing delays while maintaining effective speech intelligibility enhancement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a streamlined processing pipeline that rapidly calculates speech intelligibility measures and quickly adjusts enhancement parameters using closed-form solutions. This rushing through the optimization process with efficient algorithms reduces processing delay while achieving the necessary speech intelligibility enhancement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS12614559B2Near-end speech intelligibility enhancement with minimal artifacts
Publication Date: 2026.04.28 RTX AS CO
  • US12614559B2 patent drawing
  • US12614559B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for enhancement of speech intelligibility in a device arranged for a near-end side a communication with a far-end device. The method involves calculating a measure of speech intelligibility at the near-end side based on a near-end audio input and a far-end audio input. Then, based on the calculated measure of speech intelligibility optimizing parameters of a predetermined speech enhancement algorithm, where a predetermined speech intelligibility target, and an additional target are taken into account to generate an optimized speech enhancement algorithm. Next, processing the far-end audio input according to the optimized speech enhancement algorithm, and generating a near-end audio output accordingly. The algorithm can adapt to changing noise conditions and be optimized for both speech intelligibility and another target. This can be used to minimize delay, electric power consumption and audio quality while satisfying the speech intelligibility target. The optimization can be based on a closed-form solution.