Adaptive Sub-Sampling Electron Microscopy for Resolution and Dose Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electron microscopy techniques face limitations in data acquisition efficiency due to high electron beam currents, long acquisition times, and data-handling burdens, which restrict the quantity and quality of information obtainable, especially for sensitive specimens.

Innovation Solution

The method involves adapting sub-sampling schemes and electron doses based on computational analysis of initial sparse datasets to optimize data acquisition in electron microscopes, minimizing electron dose while maximizing resolution and image quality, by informing subsequent measurements with features like regional intensity maxima and pixel variance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If high electron beam current and long dwell time are used to achieve high resolution and sensitivity, then measurement precision and detection capability are improved, but specimen damage increases and acquisition time becomes too long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolutionVSAvoidspecimen damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs a preliminary low-dose sub-sampled scan to acquire initial sparse data, then uses computational analysis of this preliminary data to determine an adapted sub-sampling scheme for subsequent scans. This preliminary action allows the system to identify important regions and patterns before committing significant electron dose, thereby achieving high resolution while minimizing total specimen damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The adapted sub-sampling scheme concentrates electron dose on specific regions of interest identified through computational analysis of initial data, rather than uniformly distributing dose across the entire specimen. By applying higher local dose only where needed and using lower dose elsewhere, the system achieves high measurement precision in critical areas while minimizing overall specimen damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If high electron beam current and large data acquisition are used to deliver high resolution, then measurement precision is improved, but data-handling burden and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolutionVSAvoiddata-handling capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and processes only the most relevant features from the sparse datasets using computational analysis, rather than handling and processing all acquired data in full detail. By identifying and focusing on key patterns, edges, and regions of interest through computational analysis, the system achieves high-resolution reconstruction while significantly reducing the data-handling burden on computational systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The data acquisition and processing is segmented into multiple stages: initial sparse data acquisition, computational analysis to identify important features, adapted sub-sampling scheme determination, and subsequent targeted data collection. This segmentation allows the system to process data incrementally and focus computational resources on the most critical information, reducing overall processing complexity while maintaining high resolution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If conventional sub-sampling is used to reduce electron dose and acquisition time, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision and image quality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacquisition speedVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The sub-sampling scheme is made dynamic and adaptive rather than static and fixed. The system continuously updates the sub-sampling strategy based on computational analysis of previously acquired sparse data, adjusting which regions are sampled and at what density. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain high measurement precision while preserving the productivity benefits of sub-sampling by concentrating measurements on the most informative regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses computational analysis of initial sparse datasets to provide feedback that informs the adapted sub-sampling scheme for subsequent measurements. This feedback loop allows the system to learn from previously acquired data and improve the quality of subsequent measurements, thereby achieving high image quality while maintaining the rapid acquisition speeds enabled by sub-sampling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10256072B2Optimized sub-sampling in an electron microscope
Publication Date: 2019.04.09 BATTELLE MEMORIAL INST
  • US10256072B2 patent drawing
  • US10256072B2 patent drawing
  • US10256072B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are methods for optimized sub-sampling in an electron microscope. With regard at least to utilization of electron dose budgets, of time for acquisition of measurements, and of computing/processing capabilities, very high efficiencies can be achieved by informing and/or adapting subsequent sub-sampling measurements according to one or more earlier-acquired sparse datasets and/or according to analyzes thereof.