Adaptive Test Generation Using Knowledge Graph Mastery Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional educational assessments are static and fail to adapt to individual student performance, leading to misalignment between students' knowledge levels and their assigned learning paths, resulting in ineffective learning experiences and resource wastage.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive test generation system utilizing programmatic control and guided/constrained AI engines to select educational standards based on real-time user responses, updating knowledge graphs, and determining the test's end based on predefined rules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If static assessment tests with fixed questions are used, then the assessment structure is simple and easy to administer, but the tests fail to accurately capture student knowledge levels and do not adapt to individual performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of knowledge level assessmentVSAvoidassessment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptive testing where the assessment system continuously adjusts question selection and difficulty based on real-time student performance. The test transitions from a static fixed-question format to a dynamic system that adapts its structure, content, and difficulty level according to the student's demonstrated knowledge, thereby improving measurement precision without requiring overly complex infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates real-time feedback mechanisms where student responses are immediately analyzed and used to adjust subsequent question selection. This feedback loop enables the assessment to accurately track knowledge levels by continuously adapting to student performance, resolving the contradiction between assessment accuracy and system complexity through intelligent algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If one-size-fits-all static assessments are used, then the administration process is simple and resource-efficient, but student placement is inaccurate and learning paths are misaligned

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment administration easeVSAvoidstudent placement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The adaptive testing system performs self-adjustment based on student responses, automatically selecting appropriate questions and adjusting difficulty levels without requiring manual intervention. This self-service capability maintains ease of administration while significantly improving placement accuracy, as the system autonomously adapts to each student's needs in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes assessment parameters such as question difficulty, topic selection, and test length based on student performance. By automatically adjusting these parameters, the system achieves reliable student placement while keeping the administration process simple and resource-efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional static tests are used, then the test structure is stable and predictable, but the tests cannot adapt to changing educational content and student needs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to student performanceVSAvoidtest generation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring question banks tagged with metadata such as difficulty levels, topics, and learning objectives. This preliminary preparation enables rapid adaptation during testing without requiring complex real-time generation, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity through advance planning and structured data organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The adaptive testing system serves multiple functions: assessment, diagnostic evaluation, and learning path recommendation. By integrating these functions into a single platform that leverages student performance data across different contexts, the system achieves high adaptability while managing complexity through unified architecture and standardized processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260024457A1Adaptive testing based on user mastery levels of educational standards using integrated programmatic control and specialized guided and constrained artificial intelligence
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 2HR LEARNING INC
  • US20260024457A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024457A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024457A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An adaptive test generation system based on varying mastery levels of the user on educational standards to guide and constrain an AI engine in selecting educational standards for adaptive testing and updating user mastery levels based on real-time responses is disclosed. The method involves receiving a list of eligible standards, the user's knowledge graph, and dependencies between standards. A prompt is generated to direct AI engine in choosing the next educational standard for questioning. The AI engine selects a standard based on current knowledge graph and previous user responses, presents a question, and receives the user's answer. The knowledge graph is updated to reflect user's mastery levels of related standards. The AI engine then selects next standard, considering the updated knowledge graph and interdependencies among standards. This iterative process determines difficulty of subsequent questions and continues until the adaptive test concludes, based on the states of the educational standards involved.