Adaptive Threshing Control for Variable Crop Moisture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural machines face challenges in efficiently processing harvested crops due to varying crop conditions such as moisture and toughness levels, which affect the power requirements of their subsystems like threshing and chopper rotors, leading to inconsistent performance and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a method and system that uses sensors to measure performance parameters like torque and force on knives, along with machine parameters like feed rate and rotational speed, to determine crop conditions and adjust power requirements dynamically through a controller, ensuring optimal processing and energy usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the agricultural machine processes harvested crop with fixed machine parameters, then the device complexity is reduced, but the processing efficiency and energy consumption vary inconsistently due to varying crop conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the machine parameters (rotational speed of threshing rotor, rotational speed of chopper rotor, position of opposing knives) variable and adjustable based on real-time crop condition detection. The controller dynamically modifies these parameters to match the actual crop moisture and toughness levels, transforming the system from a fixed-parameter machine to an adaptive one that optimizes processing efficiency for varying crop conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using sensors to continuously monitor performance parameters (torque of threshing rotor, torque of chopper rotor, force on opposing knives) and comparing them against threshold values. Based on this feedback, the controller automatically adjusts machine parameters to maintain optimal processing conditions, creating a closed-loop control system that responds to actual crop conditions rather than operating on fixed settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Use of energy by moving object

If the agricultural machine uses fixed power settings for threshing and chopper rotors, then the operation is simpler, but energy consumption cannot be optimized for varying crop moisture and toughness levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by enabling the agricultural machine to automatically detect crop conditions through sensors and adjust its own power settings without requiring manual intervention. The controller monitors performance parameters and autonomously modifies rotational speeds and knife positions to optimize energy consumption for the actual crop conditions, making the system self-regulating rather than requiring operator adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by systematically varying machine parameters (rotational speed of threshing rotor, rotational speed of chopper rotor, position of opposing knives) in response to detected crop conditions. The controller modifies these parameters to match the actual moisture and toughness levels of the harvested crop, optimizing energy consumption for each specific processing condition rather than using uniform power settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If the agricultural machine processes crop without real-time parameter adjustment, then the system is simpler, but crop quality consistency deteriorates due to unoptimized processing conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop quality consistencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using sensors to continuously monitor performance parameters (torque of threshing rotor, torque of chopper rotor, force on opposing knives) and comparing them against threshold values. Based on this feedback, the controller automatically adjusts machine parameters to maintain optimal processing conditions, creating a closed-loop control system that responds to actual crop conditions rather than operating on fixed settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies mechanics substitution by replacing manual mechanical adjustment with an automated electronic control system. Instead of requiring physical adjustment of machine parameters by the operator, the system uses electronic sensors and controllers to automatically detect crop conditions and modify mechanical settings, thereby maintaining consistent crop quality without increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20240292783A1Crop Condition Categorization System and Method
Publication Date: 2024.09.05 DEERE & CO
  • US20240292783A1 patent drawing
  • US20240292783A1 patent drawing
  • US20240292783A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An agricultural machine includes a cutting head configured to harvest crop, a threshing assembly and a crop debris routing assembly configured to process the harvested crop, and a controller. The threshing assembly includes a thresher basket, guide vanes, and a threshing rotor, and the crop debris routing assembly includes opposing knives and a chopper rotor. The controller is configured to receive one or more machine parameters and one or more performance parameters and determine at least one of a moisture level of the harvested crop and a toughness level of the harvested crop based on the received one or more machine parameters and one or more performance parameters. The machine parameters are adjustable inputs to the agricultural machine and the performance parameters are sensed outputs of the agricultural machine.