Adaptive Proximity Thresholds for Acoustic Howling Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current howling suppression methods in wireless communication systems use fixed proximity thresholds that do not account for varying acoustic environments, leading to ineffective suppression in different settings, such as open versus enclosed spaces.

Innovation Solution

Adaptive proximity thresholds are dynamically set based on ultrasonic transmissions to determine the acoustic environment, allowing for effective howling suppression as communication devices move between different environments by adjusting loudspeaker volume accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If fixed proximity thresholds are used for howling suppression, then the system is simple to implement, but the suppression effectiveness deteriorates in varying acoustic environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehowling suppression system complexityVSAvoidhowling suppression effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic proximity thresholds that automatically adapt to different acoustic environments (enclosed vs. open spaces) based on real-time acoustic characteristics detection, transforming the static threshold system into a dynamic one that adjusts to environmental conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the threshold parameters based on detected acoustic environment characteristics, modifying the proximity threshold values dynamically according to whether the environment is enclosed or open, thereby optimizing suppression effectiveness for each environment type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If ultrasonic transmissions are used to detect acoustic environment, then the suppression accuracy is improved, but the energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacoustic environment detection accuracyVSAvoiddevice energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs ultrasonic transmissions periodically rather than continuously, detecting acoustic environment characteristics at intervals to determine when threshold adjustments are needed, thereby reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining detection accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the existing communication device's own ultrasonic transmission capability to detect the acoustic environment, eliminating the need for separate detection hardware and reducing overall system energy requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides more effective howling suppression across various acoustic environments, ensuring clear communication by accurately attenuating audio feedback loops.

Implementation Method 1

receive, via the microphone, an acoustic signal from a second communication device operating in an acoustic field with the communication device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic signal reception: Sound

Implementation Method 2

determine a reflection pattern for the acoustic field based on the received acoustic signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS10284728B1Adaptive proximity thresholds for dynamic howling suppression
Publication Date: 2019.05.07 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC
  • US10284728B1 patent drawing
  • US10284728B1 patent drawing
  • US10284728B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Devices and methods for howling suppression. One method includes receiving, via a microphone, an acoustic signal from a communication device operating in an acoustic field with the microphone. The method includes determining a reflection pattern for the acoustic field based on the acoustic signal, and determining an acoustic characteristic for the acoustic field based on the reflection pattern. The method includes determining, based on the acoustic characteristic, a plurality of howling zones for the acoustic field, each zone defined by first and second proximity thresholds. The method includes, for each of the howling zones, determining an attenuation level for the zone based on the proximity thresholds and the acoustic characteristic. The method includes determining a distance between the microphone and the communication device, selecting one of the howling zones based on the distance, and adjusting a volume of a loudspeaker based on the attenuation level for the selected howling zone.