Adaptive Thrust Sensor Drilling Speed Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current drilling technologies face inefficiencies when drilling through stacks of materials with varying hardness levels, as they often require constant speed adjustments due to the wear of drill bits and inability to adapt to different material layers, leading to increased drilling time and reduced accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and apparatus that uses a spindle motor, thrust motor, load sensor, and controller to dynamically adjust drilling speeds based on detected reaction thrust forces, allowing for precise control of drilling speeds for each material layer without relying on actual thrust force measurements, thus adapting to changes in material hardness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a single drilling speed is set for the hardest material in the stackup, then drilling precision is maintained for hard materials, but drilling time increases significantly for soft materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling precisionVSAvoiddrilling time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The drilling system dynamically adjusts the drilling speed based on the detected material layer. The controller receives feedback from sensors that identify whether the drill bit is engaged with hard or soft material, and automatically modifies the spindle speed accordingly. This resolves the contradiction by making the drilling speed adaptive rather than static, allowing fast drilling through soft materials while maintaining appropriate speed for hard materials to preserve precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates sensors (such as thrust sensors, torque sensors, or acoustic emission sensors) that provide real-time feedback about the material being drilled. This feedback loop enables the controller to identify material transitions and adjust drilling parameters automatically. The feedback mechanism allows the system to distinguish between hard and soft materials during drilling and optimize speed for each, thereby reducing overall drilling time while maintaining precision when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If drilling speed is reduced for hard materials, then drilling quality is improved, but overall productivity decreases due to extended drilling time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling qualityVSAvoiddrilling time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The drilling speed is made dynamic and adaptive to the material being processed. Rather than maintaining a consistently slow speed for all materials, the system accelerates through soft materials and only reduces speed when hard materials are detected. This dynamic adjustment minimizes the time spent at reduced speeds while ensuring quality is maintained when necessary, thereby resolving the time-quality trade-off.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Different drilling speeds are applied to different material layers based on their specific requirements. Soft materials receive high-speed drilling optimized for productivity, while hard materials receive low-speed drilling optimized for quality. This localized optimization of drilling parameters for each material type eliminates the need to slow down the entire drilling process, reducing overall time loss while preserving drilling quality where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If mechanical sensors are used to detect material layers, then drilling speed can be adjusted for different materials, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling speed adjustmentVSAvoidsensor mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical sensing mechanisms with alternative detection methods such as acoustic emission sensors, torque sensors, or thrust sensors that are already integrated into modern drilling systems. These sensors detect material transitions through changes in drilling parameters (vibrations, torque fluctuations, thrust force) rather than requiring separate mechanical layer-detection mechanisms. This substitution maintains adaptability while reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses sensors that serve multiple functions: they monitor drilling performance, detect material transitions, and provide data for process optimization. By making the sensors multi-functional, the system achieves adaptability without adding dedicated complexity for layer detection. The same sensors used for general drilling monitoring also enable material identification and speed adjustment, eliminating the need for separate detection mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Manufacturing precision

If constant speed adjustments are made during drilling, then accuracy is improved for each material layer, but system complexity and operational difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling accuracyVSAvoidoperational difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The drilling system performs self-adjustment of drilling speed based on automatic material detection. The controller autonomously modifies drilling parameters in response to sensor feedback without requiring operator intervention. This self-service capability maintains high drilling accuracy across different materials while simplifying operation, as the system handles the complexity of speed adjustments automatically rather than requiring manual control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The closed-loop feedback system continuously monitors drilling conditions and automatically adjusts speed in response to detected material transitions. This automated feedback control eliminates the need for manual speed adjustments by the operator, reducing operational difficulty while maintaining precision. The system self-regulates based on real-time conditions, making the process easier to operate despite the complexity of adapting to multiple materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables faster and more accurate drilling by identifying new layers through changes in reaction thrust force, allowing for optimized drilling speeds for each material, reducing the need for constant adjustments and improving overall drilling efficiency and precision.

Implementation Method 1

a load sensor capable of detecting a reaction thrust force during the drilling operation to form a detected reaction thrust force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThrust force detection: Force

Data Source

PatentEP2128729B1Adaptive thrust sensor drilling
Publication Date: 2017.07.12 THE BOEING CO
  • EP2128729B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2128729B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP2128729B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6

AI summary

A computer implemented method, apparatus, and computer usable program code for performing a drilling operation. The drilling apparatus comprises a housing (302), a spindle (304), a spindle motor (308), a thrust motor (306), a load sensor (310), and a controller (312). The spindle may be capable of receiving a drill bit. The spindle motor may be capable of turning the spindle at a set of different speeds during the drilling operation. The thrust motor may be capable of moving the spindle in an axial direction. The load sensor may be capable of detecting a reaction thrust force during the drilling operation to form a detected reaction thrust force. The controller may be capable of controlling the spindle motor and the thrust motor to change a drilling speed in response to changes in the detected reaction thrust force.