Adaptive Timeout Scheduling for Data Storage Background Operations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data storage systems face inefficiencies in reducing power consumption and memory latency due to inaccurate prediction of host command receipt, leading to sub-optimal scheduling of background management operations.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an adaptive timeout parameter in data storage systems to dynamically set a timeout value based on factors like criticality levels of background management operations, random variables, and machine-learned models to predict host command likelihood, thereby optimizing the scheduling of background management operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If background management operations are scheduled to be performed while host commands are not received, then power consumption is reduced, but prediction accuracy of host command receipt is low leading to sub-optimal scheduling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static timeout values to dynamic adaptive timeout values that adjust based on operational conditions. The timeout parameter is continuously updated based on observed host command patterns and system state, allowing the scheduling mechanism to adapt to changing workloads and improve prediction accuracy over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the outcome of previous scheduling decisions is used to refine future predictions. By monitoring whether host commands were actually received during predicted idle periods, the system adjusts its timeout values and scheduling decisions to improve accuracy and reduce energy consumption in subsequent operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If background management operations are scheduled during predicted idle periods, then memory latency is reduced, but sub-optimal scheduling due to inaccurate prediction increases latency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory latencyVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The timeout parameter dynamically adjusts based on observed host command intervals and system operational patterns. This allows the system to optimize the timing of background operations to occur during actual idle periods, minimizing memory latency while avoiding interruptions to host commands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of host command patterns and system state before scheduling background operations. By predicting idle periods in advance using adaptive timeout values, the system can proactively schedule background management operations during confirmed idle windows, reducing memory latency without compromising host command processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If existing scheduling techniques are used, then system operation is simplified, but overall performance in minimizing power consumption and latency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling simplicityVSAvoidsystem performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically adjusts its own scheduling parameters based on observed operational patterns. The adaptive timeout mechanism self-tunes by monitoring host command receipt patterns and system state, eliminating the need for manual configuration while optimizing performance for power consumption and latency reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes its operational parameters (timeout values) dynamically based on system state and observed patterns. This allows the scheduling mechanism to maintain simplicity in operation while achieving superior performance through adaptive parameter adjustment rather than complex manual scheduling configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11442635B2Data storage systems and methods for optimized scheduling of background management operations
Publication Date: 2022.09.13 SANDISK TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US11442635B2 patent drawing
  • US11442635B2 patent drawing
  • US11442635B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus, media, methods, and systems for data storage systems and methods for optimized scheduling of background management operations. A data storage system may comprise a controller. The controller is configured to determine a timeout value of an adaptive timeout parameter of the data storage system. The controller is configured to determine whether a first host operation is received. The controller is configured to, when the first host operation is not received, determine whether the timeout value satisfies a threshold value. The controller is configured to, when the timeout value satisfies the threshold value, cause one or more background management operations to be executed at the data storage system.