Adaptive Tomogram Analysis for Eye Region Diagnosis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for eye region diagnosis, such as OCT, require multiple processing methods and parameters for detecting various diseases, leading to increased user load and inefficient calculation processes.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus and method that adaptively acquires eye region diagnosis information by detecting predetermined layers, changing algorithms based on extracted information, and quantifying lesions for multiple disease diagnoses from tomograms without increasing user load.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple processing methods and parameters are used for detecting various eye diseases, then the comprehensiveness of diagnosis is improved, but the user load and calculation complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensiveness of diagnosisVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a single image processing apparatus that performs multiple diagnostic functions by automatically selecting and executing different processing methods based on the input tomogram characteristics. The system can detect various eye diseases (glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, etc.) using one unified platform that adapts its processing approach according to the detected layer states and disease patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its processing methodology based on real-time analysis of the tomogram data. It automatically determines the appropriate processing method by evaluating layer boundary detection results and layer state information, then switches between different diagnostic algorithms without requiring manual user intervention or parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple processing methods are executed for different diseases, then diagnostic coverage is improved, but calculation time and processing efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic coverageVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the diagnostic process into distinct processing methods, each optimized for specific disease types. The system divides the overall diagnosis into layer detection, layer state determination, and disease-specific analysis stages, allowing it to apply only the necessary processing steps for each case rather than executing all possible diagnostic algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary layer detection and state determination before executing disease-specific processing. By pre-analyzing the tomogram to identify which layers are present and their states, the system can select and apply only the relevant processing methods needed for the detected conditions, avoiding unnecessary calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If fixed analysis methods are used, then processing simplicity is maintained, but the ability to detect multiple disease types is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoiddisease detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The image processing apparatus performs self-service by automatically determining which processing methods to apply based on its analysis of the input tomogram. The system autonomously evaluates layer detection results and layer states, then selects appropriate diagnostic algorithms without requiring user input or manual configuration, maintaining operational simplicity while achieving versatile disease detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from layer detection and state determination results to dynamically select processing methods. The output of preliminary analysis feeds into the decision-making process for choosing subsequent diagnostic steps, creating an adaptive loop that maintains simplicity while enhancing disease detection capability based on actual data characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9053536B2Image processing apparatus and image processing method for a tomogram of an eye region
Publication Date: 2015.06.09 CANON KK
  • US9053536B2 patent drawing
  • US9053536B2 patent drawing
  • US9053536B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided a technique for adaptively acquiring, from a tomogram of an eye region, diagnosis information data of the eye region which is used for the diagnosis of a plurality of kinds of diseases, without increasing load on a user. A layer acquisition unit (331) acquires a predetermined layer area from the tomogram of the eye region. A changing unit (332) changes an algorithm for the acquisition of diagnosis information data as information used for the diagnosis of the eye region from the tomogram based on the information data extracted from the layer area. A quantifying unit (336) acquires diagnosis information data from the tomogram based on the changed algorithm.