Adaptive Translation Suggestion Pool for Domain-Specific Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Computer-aided translation systems face inaccuracies and latency issues when dealing with domain-specific terminology and non-standard usage, leading to reduced productivity and increased delays for human translators.

Innovation Solution

A computer-aided translation system that generates a suggestion pool of possible translations using both general and customized translation models, allowing for real-time updates based on user input, enabling adaptive and accurate suggestions even after initial rejections, and incorporating domain-specific data to improve translation accuracy and speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If general machine translation systems are used to provide translation suggestions, then translation speed is maintained, but translation accuracy deteriorates in domain-specific contexts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation speedVSAvoidtranslation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The translation system is segmented into multiple specialized translation models, each trained on specific domain data. Instead of using a single general model, the system divides translation capabilities into domain-specific segments that can be selected based on the translation context, thereby maintaining both speed through automated model selection and accuracy through domain-specialized translation engines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of the translation model by dynamically selecting different models based on domain parameters. When domain-specific terminology is detected, the system switches from a general translation model to a domain-specialized model, adjusting the translation approach to match the specific linguistic and terminological requirements of that domain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If translators manually review and modify every machine translation suggestion, then translation accuracy is improved, but translation productivity deteriorates due to additional time requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation accuracyVSAvoidtranslation productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where translator corrections and modifications are fed back into the suggestion generation process. When a translator modifies a suggestion, the system learns from this feedback and adjusts future suggestions accordingly, progressively improving accuracy while reducing the need for extensive manual review over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary filtering and ranking of translation suggestions before presenting them to the translator. By pre-processing the suggestion pool to prioritize the most accurate options based on domain-specific criteria, the system reduces the translator's workload while maintaining high accuracy standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Speed

If machine translation latency is reduced to improve real-time translation, then translation speed is improved, but suggestion quality deteriorates due to insufficient processing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation speedVSAvoidsuggestion quality
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Translation models and domain-specific data are pre-processed and loaded into memory before translation tasks begin. Frequently used translation patterns and domain terminology are pre-computed and cached, allowing the system to provide high-quality suggestions with minimal processing latency during actual translation operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The translation processing is segmented into critical path operations that can be executed in parallel. The system divides the translation suggestion generation into independent tasks that can be simultaneously processed, reducing overall latency while maintaining comprehensive analysis quality for each suggestion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If domain-specific translation models are used to improve accuracy, then translation accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a universal framework that can accommodate multiple domain-specific models through a common interface and selection mechanism. This multi-functional architecture allows the same system to handle general translation and various domain-specific translations without requiring separate dedicated systems for each domain, thereby managing complexity while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10089303B2Customizable and low-latency interactive computer-aided translation
Publication Date: 2018.10.02 AIRBNB INC
  • US10089303B2 patent drawing
  • US10089303B2 patent drawing
  • US10089303B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-aided translation system includes a processor configured to generate a suggestion pool of possible translations for each sentence in a document. A translation module configured to provide a best suggestion from the suggestion pool to a user for a sentence being translated and to provide an updated best suggestion from the updated suggestion pool to the user after the receipt of a user's translation prefix input. A pool update module configured to update the suggestion pool based on the user's input of a translation prefix.