Adaptive TRC Cycle-Up Criteria for Xerographic Printers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Static TRC cycle-up criteria in xerographic marking devices lead to unnecessary delays or premature initiation of print jobs due to noise level estimates, affecting system performance and print quality stability.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that adjust TRC cycle-up criteria based on current noise level estimates, using a controller to compare sensor readings with target values and adjust criteria dynamically, allowing for optimal print job initiation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If static TRC cycle-up criteria are used, then system performance and print quality stability can be maintained, but unnecessary delays or premature initiation of print jobs occur due to noise level estimates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprint quality stabilityVSAvoiduser wait time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from static TRC cycle-up criteria to dynamic criteria that automatically adjust based on real-time noise level estimates. The system continuously monitors noise levels and modifies the cycle-up convergence criteria accordingly, allowing the thresholds to adapt to changing operational conditions rather than remaining fixed throughout the printing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by modifying the TRC cycle-up criteria values based on measured noise levels. When noise levels are high, the criteria are relaxed to prevent unnecessary delays; when noise levels are low, the criteria are tightened to ensure print quality. This dynamic parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction between maintaining reliability and reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If tight TRC cycle-up criteria are used, then print quality stability is improved, but component and material life is reduced due to unnecessary cycling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprint quality stabilityVSAvoidcomponent and material life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the TRC cycle-up criteria parameters dynamically based on noise level measurements. When noise levels indicate unstable conditions, the system relaxes the criteria to reduce unnecessary cycling and extend component life. When conditions are stable, the system tightens the criteria to maintain print quality, thus resolving the contradiction between quality stability and component durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms where noise level measurements continuously inform the adjustment of TRC cycle-up criteria. This closed-loop feedback allows the system to learn from operational conditions and adjust thresholds accordingly, preventing unnecessary cycling that would degrade components while maintaining print quality when conditions permit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If loose TRC cycle-up criteria are used, then user wait time is reduced, but print quality stability is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser wait timeVSAvoidprint quality stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts TRC cycle-up criteria based on real-time noise level estimates. When noise levels are low and system conditions are stable, the criteria are tightened to ensure print quality. When noise levels are high and conditions are unstable, the criteria are relaxed to reduce wait time, thus resolving the contradiction between time loss and quality stability through adaptive parameter changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by making TRC cycle-up criteria flexible rather than fixed. The system continuously adapts the convergence thresholds based on operational noise levels, allowing the criteria to be tight when conditions permit for quality stability, and loose when conditions require for reduced wait time, thus resolving the contradiction dynamically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8314959B2Adaptive cycle up convergence criteria
Publication Date: 2012.11.20 XEROX CORP
  • US8314959B2 patent drawing
  • US8314959B2 patent drawing
  • US8314959B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of adjusting cycle-up criteria of a device based on estimated noise levels, including obtaining a current estimated noise level, adjusting the cycle-up criteria according to the estimated noise level, comparing at least one signal, from which the noise level is estimated, with at least one target value, calculating the difference between the signal and the at least one target value, calculating the calculated difference between the signal and the at least one target value with the adjusted cycle-up criteria; and initiating a print job if the calculated difference falls within the adjusted cycle-up criteria.