Adaptive Trim Assemblies for Aircraft Fuselage Deformation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing decorative trim assemblies for aircraft interiors fail to adapt to fuselage deformation during flight, leading to visible gaps and aesthetic issues, despite traditional adjustment methods, which are time-consuming and imperfect.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive self-adjusting trim assembly with L-shaped connectors allowing axial movement between panels, featuring two-way and four-way locator joints, enabling panels to naturally move with fuselage deformation without compromising interior aesthetics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional adjustment methods are used to trim panels on the ground, then panel fit is improved during ground operations, but visible gaps appear during flight due to fuselage deformation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel fitVSAvoidadaptation to fuselage deformation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The connector is designed with a sliding mechanism that allows it to dynamically adjust its position along the panel edge. The slot in the connector body and pin in the connector leg enable relative movement between the connector components, allowing the system to adapt to fuselage deformation during flight while maintaining panel alignment during ground operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The connector acts as an intermediary element between two panels, providing a controlled gap that can vary in size. This intermediary component absorbs the deformation stress and allows panels to move independently while maintaining an aesthetically acceptable gap, resolving the contradiction between fixed panel fit and adaptive deformation compensation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Stability of the object's composition

If panels are fixed rigidly to each other, then structural stability is improved, but visible gaps appear during flight due to fuselage deformation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidadaptation to fuselage deformation
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The connector transitions from a static fixed connection to a dynamic adjustable connection. The sliding mechanism within the connector allows panels to move relative to each other in response to fuselage deformation, maintaining structural stability while adapting to changing geometric conditions during flight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The connector changes its effective length and position parameters through the sliding mechanism. As fuselage deformation occurs, the connector adjusts its geometric parameters to accommodate the changing panel positions, maintaining structural integrity while adapting to the deformed state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If gap filler panels are used to cover integration regions, then visible gaps are hidden, but bonding and adhesion issues occur requiring frequent replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisible gapsVSAvoidbonding reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding gap filler panels that create adhesion problems, the solution extracts the gap-filling function into the connector design itself. The connector is designed to provide a controlled, aesthetically acceptable gap without requiring additional filler materials, eliminating the bonding and adhesion issues associated with gap fillers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The connector provides a permanent, reliable solution that eliminates the need for disposable or frequently replaced gap filler panels. By integrating the gap control function into the structural connector, the system achieves long-term reliability without the adhesion problems of separate filler components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Ease of manufacture

If numerous adjustments are made to panels, then aesthetic appearance is improved, but assembly time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaesthetic appearanceVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The connector is designed with preliminary positioning features including slots and pins that guide panel alignment during installation. This preliminary action built into the connector design reduces the need for numerous post-installation adjustments, improving aesthetic appearance while reducing assembly time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The connector provides self-aligning and self-adjusting features through its sliding mechanism and geometric design. The system serves itself by automatically accommodating panel position variations and maintaining aesthetic gaps without requiring extensive manual adjustment, reducing both assembly time and labor requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP2803568B1Adaptive decorative trim assemblies for vehicle cabin interiors
Publication Date: 2016.02.17 EMBRAER SA
  • EP2803568B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2803568B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2803568B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Adaptive, self-adjusting decorative trim assemblies are especially adapted for use in aircraft cabin interiors where the fuselage undergoes deformation and/or distortion due to pressurization during flight. The self-adjusting features of the decorative trim assemblies according to the embodiments described herein thus allow for relative movement between mutually intersecting interior cabin panels (12, 14) without jeopardizing the cabin interior aesthetics (e.g., since the relative positioning of the panels is not disrupted by virtue of such fuselage deformations).