Adaptive UAV Control Interface for Dynamic Waypoint Adjustment
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current UAV control systems lack adaptive user interfaces that can dynamically adjust based on the specific characteristics and requirements of different unmanned aerial vehicles, such as varying numbers of waypoints, controls, and emergency situations, leading to inefficiencies in mission planning and execution.
Innovation Solution
The system implements a method and device for automatic adaptation of the graphical user interface, which includes displaying a plurality of objects associated with a selected UAV, adjusting the number of waypoints, and adapting controls based on factors like selection, history, emergency alerts, and sensor data, using a processor and memory with executable instructions to provide a customized interface for each UAV.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If a fixed graphical user interface is used for all UAVs, then the interface is simple to implement, but it cannot adapt to different UAV characteristics and requirements
Solution Approach 1:
The graphical user interface dynamically adapts its configuration based on the selected UAV type. When a user selects a different UAV from the plurality of UAVs, the system automatically modifies the GUI to display only the controls and parameters relevant to that specific UAV, transforming the static interface into a dynamic one that responds to user input and UAV characteristics.
Solution Approach 2:
Different portions of the graphical user interface are customized according to the specific UAV characteristics. Each UAV type receives a tailored interface configuration that displays only the locally relevant controls, sensors, and mission parameters, rather than presenting a uniform interface for all UAV types.
2Ease of operation
If the interface displays all possible controls for all UAV types, then all potential functions are available, but the interface becomes cluttered and difficult to operate
Solution Approach 1:
The system extracts and displays only the necessary controls and parameters for the currently selected UAV type, removing irrelevant interface elements from the display. This extraction principle ensures that the interface presents a streamlined set of controls tailored to the specific UAV, reducing clutter while maintaining full functionality for that UAV type.
Solution Approach 2:
The interface dynamically adjusts the quantity of displayed elements based on the selected UAV. When switching between different UAV types, the system automatically reconfigures the number and type of controls presented, ensuring that each UAV type receives an optimally sized interface without excessive or insufficient elements.
3Adaptability or versatility
If the interface is customized for each specific UAV type, then the interface is highly adaptive, but it requires complex processing and configuration
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs self-service by automatically detecting the selected UAV type and autonomously configuring the appropriate interface settings, controls, and parameters. The interface adaptation occurs without manual intervention, as the system serves itself by matching the UAV selection with the corresponding pre-defined interface configuration, enabling high adaptability with minimal user burden.
Solution Approach 2:
The system uses feedback from the UAV selection input to automatically adjust the interface configuration. When a user selects a different UAV type, the system receives this input feedback and responds by automatically reconfiguring the interface to match the characteristics of the selected UAV, creating a closed-loop adaptation process.
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
Methods, devices, and systems are used for a vehicle user interface adaption system. In an example, operations may be effectuated that include displaying a graphical user interface including a first plurality of objects associated with a first unmanned aerial vehicle and receiving data that includes a message from the graphical user interface indicative of a selection of a second unmanned aerial vehicle. A second plurality of objects may be displayed based on the received data.