Adaptive UAV Object Detection for Reliable Obstacle Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) face challenges in efficiently detecting and avoiding obstacles in various environmental conditions, as existing object detection methods are limited by illumination, velocity, and operational modes, leading to suboptimal performance in certain scenarios.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of adaptive object detection systems in UAVs, which evaluate candidate detection types based on operational conditions and utilize temporal object detection methods, such as monocular or binocular detection, to determine optimal object detection types for accurate obstacle avoidance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional object detection methods are used in UAVs, then the system structure is simple, but the detection accuracy and reliability are insufficient under various environmental conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic selection of object detection methods based on real-time operational conditions. The system evaluates multiple detection types (e.g., template matching, feature-based detection, deep learning) and adaptively switches between them according to factors such as illumination, object velocity, and distance, thereby improving reliability without requiring all detection systems to operate simultaneously, which would increase complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes detection parameters dynamically based on environmental conditions. For example, it adjusts detection thresholds, algorithm selection, and processing intensity according to illumination levels, object speed, and range, allowing the same detection system to maintain high reliability across varying operational scenarios without requiring multiple fixed-configuration systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple object detection methods are implemented to handle various conditions, then detection reliability improves, but system complexity and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic selection of object detection methods based on real-time operational conditions. The system evaluates multiple detection types (e.g., template matching, feature-based detection, deep learning) and adaptively switches between them according to factors such as illumination, object velocity, and distance, thereby improving reliability without requiring all detection systems to operate simultaneously, which would increase complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The detection system performs self-evaluation and self-selection of appropriate detection methods based on current operational parameters. The system automatically assesses environmental conditions and chooses the most suitable detection algorithm without external intervention, reducing the need for complex manual configuration and system integration while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If adaptive object detection is implemented, then detection accuracy improves, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial processing by selecting only the necessary detection methods based on current conditions rather than running all possible detection algorithms simultaneously. For example, in clear conditions with stationary objects, simpler and faster detection methods are used, while more complex methods are reserved for challenging scenarios, thereby maintaining accuracy while reducing average processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the level of detection processing based on operational urgency and environmental factors. When objects are detected at high velocity or at critical distances, the system intensifies processing to improve accuracy. During normal operations, it reduces processing intensity to minimize time loss, achieving a dynamic balance between accuracy and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12039877B2Adaptive object detection
Publication Date: 2024.07.16 SKYDIO INC
  • US12039877B2 patent drawing
  • US12039877B2 patent drawing
  • US12039877B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Controlling an unmanned aerial vehicle to traverse a portion of an operational environment of the unmanned aerial vehicle may include obtaining an object detection type, obtaining object detection input data, obtaining relative object orientation data based on the object detection type and the object detection input data, and performing an object avoidance operation based on the relative object orientation data. The object detection type may be monocular object detection, which may include obtaining the relative object orientation data by obtaining motion data indicating a change of spatial location for the unmanned aerial vehicle between obtaining the first image and obtaining the second image based on searching along epipolar lines to obtain optical flow data.