Adaptive User Interface Competence Authentication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing user authentication methods rely on simple username/password combinations, which are easily compromised, and do not continuously verify user identity, affecting security and user experience.

Innovation Solution

A system that monitors user interactions to determine proficiency and adapt the user interface, implementing security measures when significant changes in proficiency are detected, including continuous authentication through secondary verification methods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If continuous authentication is implemented to improve security, then user identity verification is enhanced, but user experience deteriorates due to repeated authentication requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser identity verificationVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic continuous authentication in the background without requiring user intervention. The authentication process serves itself by monitoring user interactions and behaviors to verify identity continuously, eliminating the need for repeated manual authentication while maintaining security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The authentication process transitions from discrete periodic checks to continuous background verification. The system continuously monitors user interactions, device sensors, and behavioral patterns to maintain constant authentication, ensuring uninterrupted security without disrupting user workflow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Ease of operation

If simple username/password authentication is used to improve ease of operation, then user experience is improved, but security deteriorates as passwords are easily compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication processVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the authentication parameters from static credentials (username/password) to dynamic multi-factor verification including device characteristics, behavioral patterns, biometric data, and environmental context. This transforms authentication from a simple single-factor process to a comprehensive multi-parameter verification system that maintains ease of use while dramatically improving security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary authentication mechanisms between the user and the resource. Instead of direct password-based access, multiple intermediary verification layers including device fingerprinting, behavioral analysis, and contextual validation are inserted to verify identity without requiring users to manually provide complex credentials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If user interface is customized to appeal to all users then ease of operation is improved, but adaptability deteriorates as no single interface suits all user competencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interfaceVSAvoiduser competency adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The user interface transitions from a static fixed design to a dynamic adaptive system. The interface automatically adjusts its complexity, layout, and interaction patterns based on real-time analysis of user behavior, device type, and competency level. This allows the same base interface to dynamically optimize for different user groups without requiring multiple separate interface designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different interface qualities and characteristics to different users and contexts. Instead of creating entirely separate interfaces, the system modifies specific local aspects of the interface (such as text size, interaction complexity, guidance level) based on individual user needs and competencies, allowing each user to experience a locally optimized interface while sharing the same underlying system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11727096B1User interface competence based authentication
Publication Date: 2023.08.15 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US11727096B1 patent drawing
  • US11727096B1 patent drawing
  • US11727096B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The innovation disclosed and claimed herein, in one aspect thereof, comprises systems and methods of user interface competence adaptation and fraud detection. The innovation includes a user device that provides a user interface to receive user interactions. A monitoring component monitors user interactions by the user on the user device. The user interactions can be controlling, navigating, or inputting to the user interface. A determination component determines a user proficiency based on the monitored user interactions. A configurator determines and implements a device configuration for the user device based on the determined user proficiency. A security component determines a different user is accessing the user device based on a change in user proficiency exceeding a threshold change. The security component implements security measures upon determine a different user has access.