Adaptive Vehicle Control System for Operator Alertness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems that automatically manage fuel consumption and emission reduction can lead to decreased operator alertness and skill, as operators find audio or visual prompts intrusive and distracting, and these systems fail to prevent a decline in operator proficiency.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control system that uses machine learning to switch between automatic and manual control modes based on operating parameters, such as route conditions and operator alertness, monitored by an alertness detection system, to maintain operator alertness and skill without increasing fuel consumption or emissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If automatic control systems are used to reduce fuel consumption and emissions, then energy efficiency is improved, but operator skill and alertness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidoperator skill
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically switches between automatic and manual control modes based on real-time assessment of operator alertness and task requirements. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain energy efficiency through automatic control when appropriate while periodically engaging the operator to maintain skill and alertness, thus resolving the contradiction between energy savings and operator capability degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the control mode parameter (automatic vs. manual) based on varying conditions including operator alertness levels, environmental factors, and operational context. This parameter adjustment allows optimization of both energy consumption and operator skill maintenance by selecting the appropriate control mode for each specific situation rather than using a fixed control approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If operators are required to respond to audio or visual prompts at predetermined intervals, then operator alertness is maintained, but operational distraction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator alertnessVSAvoidoperational distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses continuous feedback from alertness detection sensors (monitoring physiological parameters such as eye movement, blink rate, and facial muscle tension) to dynamically determine when operator intervention is needed, replacing fixed-interval prompts with demand-based engagement. This feedback mechanism maintains operator alertness only when necessary, reducing unnecessary distractions while ensuring operator capability is maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of continuous or fixed-interval prompting, the system implements periodic engagement of the operator based on detected alertness levels and operational context. The control mode switches periodically between automatic and manual based on real-time conditions, providing just enough operator involvement to maintain alertness and skill without creating constant distraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If existing alertness monitoring systems use predetermined prompts, then operator awareness is checked, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator awarenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the operator's own physiological responses (eye movements, facial expressions, blink patterns) as natural indicators of alertness, eliminating the need for complex external testing mechanisms. The operator's body automatically provides the data needed for alertness assessment through sensors that monitor these natural physiological parameters, simplifying the system while maintaining effective monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20220063686A1Adaptive vehicle control system
Publication Date: 2022.03.03 TRANSPORTATION IP HOLDINGS LLC
  • US20220063686A1 patent drawing
  • US20220063686A1 patent drawing
  • US20220063686A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle system having processors configured to determine regions of a trip where the vehicle system is permitted for a first mode of control. The permissible regions of the trip are determined based on one or more of parameters of a route, a trend of operating parameters of the vehicle system, or a trip plan that designates one or more operational settings of the vehicle system at different locations, different times, or different distances along a route. The processors also are configured to control transition of the vehicle system between a second mode of control and the second mode of control in the regions by alerting an operator of the vehicle system, automatically switching between the modes of control, or modifying conditions on which the transition occur.