Adaptive Vehicle Cybersecurity Controller

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle cybersecurity systems lack adaptive measures to effectively respond to cyber-attacks based on the vehicle's environment and situation, as they do not adequately consider the dynamic nature of threats and resource availability.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle computer system equipped with sensors to gather environmental data and a controller that identifies cyber-attacks, determines the appropriate security protocol, and adjusts vehicle settings to respond to threats by activating or deactivating communication interfaces and security services based on the vehicle's state, location, and user demands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a fixed security protocol is activated to protect against cyber-attacks, then security reliability is improved, but vehicle performance and user experience deteriorate due to unnecessary restrictions on communication and system operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity reliabilityVSAvoidvehicle performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The security system dynamically adjusts the security protocol based on real-time analysis of vehicle environment, operational state, and threat level. The controller modifies security parameters such as communication restrictions and system access controls according to current conditions, transitioning between secure and performance-oriented modes as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes security parameters including communication interface activation states, protocol strictness levels, and system access restrictions based on environmental inputs and threat assessments. This allows the security posture to be adjusted continuously rather than maintaining a fixed state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive security monitoring is implemented to detect all cyber-attacks, then security detection capability is improved, but system complexity and computational resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The security system applies different levels of monitoring and analysis to different vehicle systems and communication interfaces based on their risk profiles. Critical systems receive enhanced scrutiny while less critical functions use standard monitoring, optimizing resource allocation across the vehicle network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The controller implements security monitoring at appropriate levels without over-engineering the system. Security measures are applied selectively based on threat assessment rather than universally across all systems, avoiding unnecessary complexity while maintaining adequate protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If strict security protocols are enforced to block all external communications, then security protection is improved, but ease of operation and system functionality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against cyber-attacksVSAvoidsystem functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Communication restrictions are dynamically adjusted based on the current security context. When threats are detected, external communications are restricted; when the environment is safe, normal communication functionality is restored. This allows the system to maintain both security and usability appropriately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares security measures in advance by establishing protocols that can be quickly activated when threats are detected. Communication interfaces are configured to be secure by default but can be rapidly opened when needed, preventing both attacks and unnecessary operational restrictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS11921853B2System for adaptive vehicle security and response
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 DENSO CORP
  • US11921853B2 patent drawing
  • US11921853B2 patent drawing
  • US11921853B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle computer system includes one or more sensors configured to receive input regarding a vehicle's environment, and a controller in communication with the one or more sensors of the vehicle. The controller is configured to identify a cyber-attack on one or more vehicle controllers in the vehicle, and respond to the cyber-attack based upon at least the vehicle environment.